Bug 1190638
Summary: | sysconf (glibc) for AArch64 does not report cache line size (LEVEL1_DCACHE_LINESIZE) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov> |
Component: | glibc | Assignee: | glibc team <glibc-bugzilla> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | arjun.is, codonell, david.abdurachmanov, fweimer, jakub, law, mjuszkie, mnewsome, pbrobinson, pfrankli |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Tracking |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | aarch64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-10-31 15:28:06 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 245418 |
Description
David Abdurachmanov
2015-02-09 10:24:53 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle. Changing version to '22'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22 This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle. Changing version to '24'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase Actually this reports zero on ARMv7/aarch64/ppc64/ppc64le although it reports correctly on s390x David can you confirm if this is still the case for F-25+ (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #3) > Actually this reports zero on ARMv7/aarch64/ppc64/ppc64le although it > reports correctly on s390x In upstream only x86_64, s390, and pp64/ppc64le have support for detection of hardware cache line sizes. ARM has not implemented this yet, so all of these routines return 0 for cache line sizes (meaning the size is not known). A return of -1 would indicate no limit, and that's not correct to return. |