Bug 1265654

Summary:	rpmtest fails in s390x because of grub2
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7	Reporter:	Tereza Cerna <tcerna>
Component:	tuned	Assignee:	Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Tereza Cerna <tcerna>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	7.2	CC:	jeder, jskarvad, jstodola, lmiksik
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Regression
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	tuned-2.5.1-4.el7	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	Cause: Previously Tuned RPM patched unconditionally grub configuration files to support alteration of kernel command line through tuned profiles (by using bootloader plugin). But there are architectures like s390(x) where grub isn't supported. Consequence: On such architectures Tuned installation/upgrade ended with error message. Fix: Conditional support for grub was added into Tuned RPM. Result: Now the Tuned RPM scriptlet patches grub configuration files only if grub is installed on the machine and the error is no more triggered on s390(x).	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-11-19 12:22:01 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1186677

Description Tereza Cerna 2015-09-23 12:26:58 UTC

Tuned doesn't reflect that grub2 is not in s390x.

From tps - rpmtest:
sed: can't read /etc/default/grub: No such file or directory
warning: %post(tuned-2.5.1-3.el7.noarch) scriptlet failed, exit status 2

# rpm -q tuned
tuned-2.5.1-3.el7.noarch

Comment 1 Jaroslav Škarvada 2015-09-23 12:32:05 UTC

It outputs errors on s390(x) during upgrade. I think it shouldn't do it. It's bad user experience.

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2015-11-19 12:22:01 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2375.html

Comment 6 Jaroslav Škarvada 2016-07-19 11:46:52 UTC

*** Bug 1257138 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***