Bug 226447
Summary: | Merge Review: sysfsutils | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> | ||||
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Todd Zullinger <tmz> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | jarod, kevin, redhat-bugzilla | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | tmz:
fedora-review+
|
||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2008-02-25 22:25:58 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 426387 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
2007-01-31 21:03:50 UTC
Should actually be assigned to nobody until someone picks it up for review, only needs to be assigned over to me once a reviewer says there's something that needs my attention. Jarod, here's a review. Things look mostly sane. The few minor issues are noted below. I'll attach a patch that makes these changes. Feel free to use some or all of it, with or without attribution. ;) * source files match upstream: b3cb316c652b09ec66f93f4ea98a93a7a1001678 sysfsutils-2.1.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) X license field matches the actual license. The main package license should be GPLv2 (cmd/systool.c specifies v2 and has no "or any later version clause") The libsysfs subpackage should be LGPLv2+ * license is open source-compatible. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none are needed). * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (fedora-devel-x86_64,). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. (not quite, but these warnings should be okay to ignore): sysfsutils.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.1.0-2 2.1.0-1.fc9 libsysfs-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation * final provides and requires are sane * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. X scriptlets are properly run for libs ldconfig needs to be run for the libsysfs subpackage * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. Created attachment 291411 [details]
patch to fix minor issues for merge review
D'oh. This got lost in the shuffle... Just made these changes (more or less) to rawhide, building now. Todd: Did you want to mark this with fedora-review + ? Jarod: You shouldn't usually close until it's been approved... ;) Yep, I wanted to look back over it before I added the fedora-review +, since it was a month ago that I did the review and my memory needs frequent refreshing. It looks like everything is good. Thanks Jarod (and Kevin for poking :). Whoops, sorry, my mistake... Got close-happy plowing through bugs yesterday... :) |