From the package review guidelines: --- MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. --- This Bug is used as a tracker for such issues. If you added a bug for a package that uses ExcludeArch, mark it as blocking this bug.
Adding Tracking keyword
Shouldn't there be separate trackers for sparcv9 and sparc64? I'd also suggest aliasing the trackers as FE-ExcludeArch-sparc{v9,64} and referencing them from the Review Guidelines page on the wiki.
I have created Bug #531446 as a separate tracker for sparc64.
closing the tracker bug as Fedora is no longer supporting SPARC hardware