Login
[x]
Log in using an account from:
Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Or login using a Red Hat Bugzilla account
Forgot Password
Login:
Hide Forgot
Create an Account
Red Hat Bugzilla – Attachment 157002 Details for
Bug 206094
Preview fails with ScanJet 5370C (avision sane-backends)
[?]
New
Simple Search
Advanced Search
My Links
Browse
Requests
Reports
Current State
Search
Tabular reports
Graphical reports
Duplicates
Other Reports
User Changes
Plotly Reports
Bug Status
Bug Severity
Non-Defaults
|
Product Dashboard
Help
Page Help!
Bug Writing Guidelines
What's new
Browser Support Policy
5.0.4.rh83 Release notes
FAQ
Guides index
User guide
Web Services
Contact
Legal
This site requires JavaScript to be enabled to function correctly, please enable it.
Analysing changes in avision CVS revisions
avision_msg (text/plain), 2.55 KB, created by
Kevin R. Page
on 2007-06-14 14:18:32 UTC
(
hide
)
Description:
Analysing changes in avision CVS revisions
Filename:
MIME Type:
Creator:
Kevin R. Page
Created:
2007-06-14 14:18:32 UTC
Size:
2.55 KB
patch
obsolete
> >On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 14:55 +0100, Rene Rebe wrote: >> Yes, I do not know off hand. But svn log on the sane-avision repository will >> indicates changesets with the model in the name. > >Ok, I have checked various versions of the avision backend out from svn. >Each time I have patched the sane-backends-1.0.18 Fedora SRPM with the >older versions of avision.c and avision.h, and rebuilt and installed the >RPM. > >I've summarised my findings below - let me know if you'd like me to try >any other specific revisions. > >There is definitely a correlation between the scan head not moving and >the "bad" noise from the scanner - i.e. when I record that the scan head >doesn't move, there will also be the "grinding" noise from the scanner. > >After testing each revision I reset the USB bus and powered down and up >the scanner - however, I wouldn't be 100% that this clears all the state >from previous test, so if something seems out of place, let me know, and >I'll re-test. > > >Working backwards: > >r288: there's an initial movement from the scan head of a few mm, but >then it doesn't move at all. No noise, though. xsane reports: "Failure >to start scanner: error during device I/O". > >r286: as r288 >r258: makes the horrible noise (but louder). >r236: as r288 > >r227: > Gray preview: no bad noises, preview scan is corrupted (no obvious >pattern), scan head only moves half-way then returns. > Colour preview: a more moderate "bad" screeching noise, scan head >doesn't move more than 10mm. > Gray full scan: corrupted with image kind of skewed and wrapped at >approx. 45 degrees. > Colour full scan: also skewed, with additional multi-colour stripes >also skewed (they'd be vertical if it weren't for the skew). > >r218: as r227 > >r210: > Gray preview: head only moves a few mm and the bad noise is produced. > Colour preview: head only moves a few mm; bad noise. > Gray full scan: head moves ok, scanned image is skewed (as r227). > Colour full scan: head moves ok, scanned image is skewed with >multicoloured lines (as r227). > >r200: > Gray preview: head moves normally, no "bad" noise, preview is a little >dark but seems ok - no corruption. > Colour preview: head moves normally, no "bad" noise, preview is correct >EXCEPT for vertical multicoloured bar. There is also possibly a "thud" >noise at the end of the scan, as if the head is hitting a stop? > Gray full scan: head moves normally, no "bad" noise, scan is skewed but >colouration is ok. > Colour full scan: head moves normally, no "bad" noise, image is skewed >with multicoloured lines (as r227). > >r115: > as r200 (possibly a smaller "thud" noise). > > >Hopefully this is of some help, > >Regards, > >Kev > >
You cannot view the attachment while viewing its details because your browser does not support IFRAMEs.
View the attachment on a separate page
.
View Attachment As Raw
Actions:
View
Attachments on
bug 206094
:
136043
|
136044
|
156852
|
156996
|
156997
|
156998
| 157002