Login
[x]
Log in using an account from:
Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Or login using a Red Hat Bugzilla account
Forgot Password
Login:
Hide Forgot
Create an Account
Red Hat Bugzilla – Attachment 309357 Details for
Bug 448333
avc: denied { read write } for comm="sendmail" path="socket:[4722163]" dev=sockfs
[?]
New
Simple Search
Advanced Search
My Links
Browse
Requests
Reports
Current State
Search
Tabular reports
Graphical reports
Duplicates
Other Reports
User Changes
Plotly Reports
Bug Status
Bug Severity
Non-Defaults
|
Product Dashboard
Help
Page Help!
Bug Writing Guidelines
What's new
Browser Support Policy
5.0.4.rh83 Release notes
FAQ
Guides index
User guide
Web Services
Contact
Legal
This site requires JavaScript to be enabled to function correctly, please enable it.
sealerts
selinux_alert.txt (text/plain), 10.44 KB, created by
Frank Murphy
on 2008-06-14 11:44:37 UTC
(
hide
)
Description:
sealerts
Filename:
MIME Type:
Creator:
Frank Murphy
Created:
2008-06-14 11:44:37 UTC
Size:
10.44 KB
patch
obsolete
> >Summary: > >SELinux is preventing pam_timestamp_c (unlabeled_t) "getattr" to / (root_t). > >Detailed Description: > >SELinux denied access requested by pam_timestamp_c. It is not expected that this >access is required by pam_timestamp_c and this access may signal an intrusion >attempt. It is also possible that the specific version or configuration of the >application is causing it to require additional access. > >Allowing Access: > >Sometimes labeling problems can cause SELinux denials. You could try to restore >the default system file context for /, > >restorecon -v '/' > >If this does not work, there is currently no automatic way to allow this access. >Instead, you can generate a local policy module to allow this access - see FAQ >(http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385) Or you can disable >SELinux protection altogether. Disabling SELinux protection is not recommended. >Please file a bug report (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi) >against this package. > >Additional Information: > >Source Context system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 >Target Context system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 >Target Objects / [ dir ] >Source pam_timestamp_c >Source Path /sbin/pam_timestamp_check >Port <Unknown> >Host rawhide-02 >Source RPM Packages pam-1.0.1-4.fc9 >Target RPM Packages filesystem-2.4.13-1.fc9 >Policy RPM selinux-policy-3.3.1-64.fc9 >Selinux Enabled True >Policy Type targeted >MLS Enabled True >Enforcing Mode Enforcing >Plugin Name catchall_file >Host Name rawhide-02 >Platform Linux rawhide-02 2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686 #1 SMP Tue > Jun 10 16:27:49 EDT 2008 i686 i686 >Alert Count 23 >First Seen Sat 14 Jun 2008 12:22:01 PM IST >Last Seen Sat 14 Jun 2008 12:24:35 PM IST >Local ID 44c8faba-729d-49e8-9522-aea82f73b43b >Line Numbers > >Raw Audit Messages > >host=rawhide-02 type=AVC msg=audit(1213442675.0:203): avc: denied { getattr } for pid=2523 comm="pam_timestamp_c" path="/" dev=dm-0 ino=2 scontext=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 tclass=dir > >host=rawhide-02 type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1213442675.0:203): arch=40000003 syscall=196 success=no exit=-13 a0=bf8908b4 a1=bf8907e0 a2=29fff4 a3=0 items=0 ppid=2503 pid=2523 auid=500 uid=500 gid=500 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=500 sgid=500 fsgid=500 tty=(none) ses=1 comm="pam_timestamp_c" exe="/sbin/pam_timestamp_check" subj=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 key=(null) > > > > >Summary: > >SELinux is preventing pam_timestamp_c (unlabeled_t) "search" to / (root_t). > >Detailed Description: > >SELinux denied access requested by pam_timestamp_c. It is not expected that this >access is required by pam_timestamp_c and this access may signal an intrusion >attempt. It is also possible that the specific version or configuration of the >application is causing it to require additional access. > >Allowing Access: > >Sometimes labeling problems can cause SELinux denials. You could try to restore >the default system file context for /, > >restorecon -v '/' > >If this does not work, there is currently no automatic way to allow this access. >Instead, you can generate a local policy module to allow this access - see FAQ >(http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385) Or you can disable >SELinux protection altogether. Disabling SELinux protection is not recommended. >Please file a bug report (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi) >against this package. > >Additional Information: > >Source Context system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 >Target Context system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 >Target Objects / [ dir ] >Source pam_timestamp_c >Source Path /sbin/pam_timestamp_check >Port <Unknown> >Host rawhide-02 >Source RPM Packages pam-1.0.1-4.fc9 >Target RPM Packages filesystem-2.4.13-1.fc9 >Policy RPM selinux-policy-3.3.1-64.fc9 >Selinux Enabled True >Policy Type targeted >MLS Enabled True >Enforcing Mode Enforcing >Plugin Name catchall_file >Host Name rawhide-02 >Platform Linux rawhide-02 2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686 #1 SMP Tue > Jun 10 16:27:49 EDT 2008 i686 i686 >Alert Count 23 >First Seen Sat 14 Jun 2008 12:22:01 PM IST >Last Seen Sat 14 Jun 2008 12:24:35 PM IST >Local ID 13111b77-27fa-4b7a-9896-89da811449e7 >Line Numbers > >Raw Audit Messages > >host=rawhide-02 type=AVC msg=audit(1213442675.0:204): avc: denied { search } for pid=2523 comm="pam_timestamp_c" name="/" dev=dm-0 ino=2 scontext=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 tclass=dir > >host=rawhide-02 type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1213442675.0:204): arch=40000003 syscall=5 success=no exit=-13 a0=2741a6 a1=0 a2=1b6 a3=2741a6 items=0 ppid=2503 pid=2523 auid=500 uid=500 gid=500 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=500 sgid=500 fsgid=500 tty=(none) ses=1 comm="pam_timestamp_c" exe="/sbin/pam_timestamp_check" subj=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 key=(null) > > > > >Summary: > >SELinux is preventing pam_timestamp_c (unlabeled_t) "create" to <Unknown> >(unlabeled_t). > >Detailed Description: > >SELinux denied access requested by pam_timestamp_c. It is not expected that this >access is required by pam_timestamp_c and this access may signal an intrusion >attempt. It is also possible that the specific version or configuration of the >application is causing it to require additional access. > >Allowing Access: > >You can generate a local policy module to allow this access - see FAQ >(http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385) Or you can disable >SELinux protection altogether. Disabling SELinux protection is not recommended. >Please file a bug report (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi) >against this package. > >Additional Information: > >Source Context system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 >Target Context system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 >Target Objects None [ unix_dgram_socket ] >Source pam_timestamp_c >Source Path /sbin/pam_timestamp_check >Port <Unknown> >Host rawhide-02 >Source RPM Packages pam-1.0.1-4.fc9 >Target RPM Packages >Policy RPM selinux-policy-3.3.1-64.fc9 >Selinux Enabled True >Policy Type targeted >MLS Enabled True >Enforcing Mode Enforcing >Plugin Name catchall >Host Name rawhide-02 >Platform Linux rawhide-02 2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686 #1 SMP Tue > Jun 10 16:27:49 EDT 2008 i686 i686 >Alert Count 23 >First Seen Sat 14 Jun 2008 12:22:01 PM IST >Last Seen Sat 14 Jun 2008 12:24:35 PM IST >Local ID c8b7cd17-3b71-4efb-875e-80e4afc01588 >Line Numbers > >Raw Audit Messages > >host=rawhide-02 type=AVC msg=audit(1213442675.0:205): avc: denied { create } for pid=2523 comm="pam_timestamp_c" scontext=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 tclass=unix_dgram_socket > >host=rawhide-02 type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1213442675.0:205): arch=40000003 syscall=102 success=no exit=-13 a0=1 a1=bf8905b0 a2=29fff4 a3=14 items=0 ppid=2503 pid=2523 auid=500 uid=500 gid=500 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=500 sgid=500 fsgid=500 tty=(none) ses=1 comm="pam_timestamp_c" exe="/sbin/pam_timestamp_check" subj=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 key=(null) > > > > >Summary: > >SELinux is preventing pam_timestamp_c (unlabeled_t) "use" to pipe >(unconfined_t). > >Detailed Description: > >SELinux denied access requested by pam_timestamp_c. It is not expected that this >access is required by pam_timestamp_c and this access may signal an intrusion >attempt. It is also possible that the specific version or configuration of the >application is causing it to require additional access. > >Allowing Access: > >You can generate a local policy module to allow this access - see FAQ >(http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385) Or you can disable >SELinux protection altogether. Disabling SELinux protection is not recommended. >Please file a bug report (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi) >against this package. > >Additional Information: > >Source Context system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 >Target Context unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1 > 023 >Target Objects pipe [ fd ] >Source pam_timestamp_c >Source Path /sbin/pam_timestamp_check >Port <Unknown> >Host rawhide-02 >Source RPM Packages pam-1.0.1-4.fc9 >Target RPM Packages >Policy RPM selinux-policy-3.3.1-64.fc9 >Selinux Enabled True >Policy Type targeted >MLS Enabled True >Enforcing Mode Enforcing >Plugin Name catchall >Host Name rawhide-02 >Platform Linux rawhide-02 2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686 #1 SMP Tue > Jun 10 16:27:49 EDT 2008 i686 i686 >Alert Count 23 >First Seen Sat 14 Jun 2008 12:22:01 PM IST >Last Seen Sat 14 Jun 2008 12:24:35 PM IST >Local ID 31018b81-b4ca-4402-9a49-0499ecf69da6 >Line Numbers > >Raw Audit Messages > >host=rawhide-02 type=AVC msg=audit(1213442675.0:206): avc: denied { use } for pid=2523 comm="pam_timestamp_c" path="pipe:[20173]" dev=pipefs ino=20173 scontext=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=fd > >host=rawhide-02 type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1213442675.0:206): arch=40000003 syscall=4 success=no exit=-13 a0=1 a1=b7f90000 a2=2 a3=2 items=0 ppid=2503 pid=2523 auid=500 uid=500 gid=500 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=500 sgid=500 fsgid=500 tty=(none) ses=1 comm="pam_timestamp_c" exe="/sbin/pam_timestamp_check" subj=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 key=(null) > >
You cannot view the attachment while viewing its details because your browser does not support IFRAMEs.
View the attachment on a separate page
.
View Attachment As Raw
Actions:
View
Attachments on
bug 448333
: 309357