Login
Log in using an SSO provider:
Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Login using a Red Hat Bugzilla account
Forgot Password
Create an Account
Red Hat Bugzilla – Attachment 374865 Details for
Bug 540330
libvirtd causes oom - possible memory leak
Home
New
Search
Simple Search
Advanced Search
My Links
Browse
Requests
Reports
Current State
Search
Tabular reports
Graphical reports
Duplicates
Other Reports
User Changes
Plotly Reports
Bug Status
Bug Severity
Non-Defaults
Product Dashboard
Help
Page Help!
Bug Writing Guidelines
What's new
Browser Support Policy
5.0.4.rh90 Release notes
FAQ
Guides index
User guide
Web Services
Contact
Legal
[?]
This site requires JavaScript to be enabled to function correctly, please enable it.
valgrind --leak-check=full /usr/sbin/libvirtd output
valgrind-out.txt (text/plain), 19.41 KB, created by
Thomas Sjolshagen
on 2009-11-30 19:51:50 UTC
(
hide
)
Description:
valgrind --leak-check=full /usr/sbin/libvirtd output
Filename:
MIME Type:
Creator:
Thomas Sjolshagen
Created:
2009-11-30 19:51:50 UTC
Size:
19.41 KB
patch
obsolete
>==8916== Memcheck, a memory error detector >==8916== Copyright (C) 2002-2009, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. >==8916== Using Valgrind-3.5.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info >==8916== Command: /usr/sbin/libvirtd >==8916== >libvir: Storage error : cannot open path '/cluster/kvm-guests/Desktops': No such file or directory >Failed to autostart storage pool 'Desktops': cannot open path '/cluster/kvm-guests/Desktops': No such file or directory14:47:10.166: warning : qemudStartup:565 : Unable to create cgroup for driver: No such device or address >==8916== Syscall param capget(data) points to unaddressable byte(s) >==8916== at 0x31752DE3B7: capget (syscall-template.S:82) >==8916== by 0x317AA01B1D: init (cap-ng.c:140) >==8916== by 0x317AA029A9: capng_clear (cap-ng.c:159) >==8916== by 0x4E5D35D: __virExec (util.c:280) >==8916== by 0x4E5DEF2: virExecWithHook (util.c:612) >==8916== by 0x4E5E0AE: virExec (util.c:632) >==8916== by 0x439D3C: qemudProbeMachineTypes (qemu_conf.c:456) >==8916== by 0x43A270: qemudCapsInitGuest (qemu_conf.c:674) >==8916== by 0x43A9A6: qemudCapsInit (qemu_conf.c:810) >==8916== by 0x435D81: qemudStartup (qemu_driver.c:568) >==8916== by 0x4E7051F: virStateInitialize (libvirt.c:827) >==8916== by 0x416409: main (qemud.c:859) >==8916== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd >==8916== >==8916== Syscall param capget(data) points to unaddressable byte(s) >==8916== at 0x31752DE3B7: capget (syscall-template.S:82) >==8916== by 0x317AA01B1D: init (cap-ng.c:140) >==8916== by 0x317AA029A9: capng_clear (cap-ng.c:159) >==8916== by 0x4E5D35D: __virExec (util.c:280) >==8916== by 0x4E5DEF2: virExecWithHook (util.c:612) >==8916== by 0x4E5E0AE: virExec (util.c:632) >==8916== by 0x439D3C: qemudProbeMachineTypes (qemu_conf.c:456) >==8916== by 0x43A769: qemudCapsInitGuest (qemu_conf.c:738) >==8916== by 0x43A9A6: qemudCapsInit (qemu_conf.c:810) >==8916== by 0x435D81: qemudStartup (qemu_driver.c:568) >==8916== by 0x4E7051F: virStateInitialize (libvirt.c:827) >==8916== by 0x416409: main (qemud.c:859) >==8916== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd >==8916== >==8916== Syscall param capget(data) points to unaddressable byte(s) >==8916== at 0x31752DE3B7: capget (syscall-template.S:82) >==8916== by 0x317AA01B1D: init (cap-ng.c:140) >==8916== by 0x317AA029A9: capng_clear (cap-ng.c:159) >==8916== by 0x4E5D35D: __virExec (util.c:280) >==8916== by 0x4E5DEF2: virExecWithHook (util.c:612) >==8916== by 0x4E5E0AE: virExec (util.c:632) >==8916== by 0x439D3C: qemudProbeMachineTypes (qemu_conf.c:456) >==8916== by 0x43A270: qemudCapsInitGuest (qemu_conf.c:674) >==8916== by 0x43A9A6: qemudCapsInit (qemu_conf.c:810) >==8916== by 0x435D81: qemudStartup (qemu_driver.c:568) >==8916== by 0x4E7051F: virStateInitialize (libvirt.c:827) >==8916== by 0x416409: main (qemud.c:859) >==8916== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd >==8916== >==8916== Syscall param capget(data) points to unaddressable byte(s) >==8916== at 0x31752DE3B7: capget (syscall-template.S:82) >==8916== by 0x317AA01B1D: init (cap-ng.c:140) >==8916== by 0x317AA029A9: capng_clear (cap-ng.c:159) >==8916== by 0x4E5D35D: __virExec (util.c:280) >==8916== by 0x4E5DEF2: virExecWithHook (util.c:612) >==8916== by 0x4E5E0AE: virExec (util.c:632) >==8916== by 0x439D3C: qemudProbeMachineTypes (qemu_conf.c:456) >==8916== by 0x43A769: qemudCapsInitGuest (qemu_conf.c:738) >==8916== by 0x43A9A6: qemudCapsInit (qemu_conf.c:810) >==8916== by 0x435D81: qemudStartup (qemu_driver.c:568) >==8916== by 0x4E7051F: virStateInitialize (libvirt.c:827) >==8916== by 0x416409: main (qemud.c:859) >==8916== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd >==8916== >==8916== Syscall param capget(data) points to unaddressable byte(s) >==8916== at 0x31752DE3B7: capget (syscall-template.S:82) >==8916== by 0x317AA01B1D: init (cap-ng.c:140) >==8916== by 0x317AA029A9: capng_clear (cap-ng.c:159) >==8916== by 0x4E5D35D: __virExec (util.c:280) >==8916== by 0x4E5DEF2: virExecWithHook (util.c:612) >==8916== by 0x4E5E0AE: virExec (util.c:632) >==8916== by 0x439D3C: qemudProbeMachineTypes (qemu_conf.c:456) >==8916== by 0x43A270: qemudCapsInitGuest (qemu_conf.c:674) >==8916== by 0x43A9A6: qemudCapsInit (qemu_conf.c:810) >==8916== by 0x435D81: qemudStartup (qemu_driver.c:568) >==8916== by 0x4E7051F: virStateInitialize (libvirt.c:827) >==8916== by 0x416409: main (qemud.c:859) >==8916== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd >==8916== >==8916== Syscall param capget(data) points to unaddressable byte(s) >==8916== at 0x31752DE3B7: capget (syscall-template.S:82) >==8916== by 0x317AA01B1D: init (cap-ng.c:140) >==8916== by 0x317AA029A9: capng_clear (cap-ng.c:159) >==8916== by 0x4E5D35D: __virExec (util.c:280) >==8916== by 0x4E5DEF2: virExecWithHook (util.c:612) >==8916== by 0x4E5E0AE: virExec (util.c:632) >==8916== by 0x439D3C: qemudProbeMachineTypes (qemu_conf.c:456) >==8916== by 0x43A270: qemudCapsInitGuest (qemu_conf.c:674) >==8916== by 0x43A9A6: qemudCapsInit (qemu_conf.c:810) >==8916== by 0x435D81: qemudStartup (qemu_driver.c:568) >==8916== by 0x4E7051F: virStateInitialize (libvirt.c:827) >==8916== by 0x416409: main (qemud.c:859) >==8916== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd >==8916== >==8916== Syscall param capget(data) points to unaddressable byte(s) >==8916== at 0x31752DE3B7: capget (syscall-template.S:82) >==8916== by 0x317AA01B1D: init (cap-ng.c:140) >==8916== by 0x317AA029A9: capng_clear (cap-ng.c:159) >==8916== by 0x4E5D35D: __virExec (util.c:280) >==8916== by 0x4E5DEF2: virExecWithHook (util.c:612) >==8916== by 0x4E5E0AE: virExec (util.c:632) >==8916== by 0x439D3C: qemudProbeMachineTypes (qemu_conf.c:456) >==8916== by 0x43A270: qemudCapsInitGuest (qemu_conf.c:674) >==8916== by 0x43A9A6: qemudCapsInit (qemu_conf.c:810) >==8916== by 0x435D81: qemudStartup (qemu_driver.c:568) >==8916== by 0x4E7051F: virStateInitialize (libvirt.c:827) >==8916== by 0x416409: main (qemud.c:859) >==8916== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd >==8916== >==8916== Syscall param capget(data) points to unaddressable byte(s) >==8916== at 0x31752DE3B7: capget (syscall-template.S:82) >==8916== by 0x317AA01B1D: init (cap-ng.c:140) >==8916== by 0x317AA029A9: capng_clear (cap-ng.c:159) >==8916== by 0x4E5D35D: __virExec (util.c:280) >==8916== by 0x4E5DEF2: virExecWithHook (util.c:612) >==8916== by 0x4E5E0AE: virExec (util.c:632) >==8916== by 0x439D3C: qemudProbeMachineTypes (qemu_conf.c:456) >==8916== by 0x43A270: qemudCapsInitGuest (qemu_conf.c:674) >==8916== by 0x43A9A6: qemudCapsInit (qemu_conf.c:810) >==8916== by 0x435D81: qemudStartup (qemu_driver.c:568) >==8916== by 0x4E7051F: virStateInitialize (libvirt.c:827) >==8916== by 0x416409: main (qemud.c:859) >==8916== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd >==8916== >==8916== Syscall param capget(data) points to unaddressable byte(s) >==8916== at 0x31752DE3B7: capget (syscall-template.S:82) >==8916== by 0x317AA01B1D: init (cap-ng.c:140) >==8916== by 0x317AA029A9: capng_clear (cap-ng.c:159) >==8916== by 0x4E5D35D: __virExec (util.c:280) >==8916== by 0x4E5DEF2: virExecWithHook (util.c:612) >==8916== by 0x4E5E0AE: virExec (util.c:632) >==8916== by 0x439D3C: qemudProbeMachineTypes (qemu_conf.c:456) >==8916== by 0x43A270: qemudCapsInitGuest (qemu_conf.c:674) >==8916== by 0x43A9A6: qemudCapsInit (qemu_conf.c:810) >==8916== by 0x435D81: qemudStartup (qemu_driver.c:568) >==8916== by 0x4E7051F: virStateInitialize (libvirt.c:827) >==8916== by 0x416409: main (qemud.c:859) >==8916== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd >==8916== >==8916== Invalid write of size 8 >==8916== at 0x43A72E: qemudCapsInitGuest (qemu_conf.c:665) >==8916== by 0x43AA4E: qemudCapsInit (qemu_conf.c:823) >==8916== by 0x435D81: qemudStartup (qemu_driver.c:568) >==8916== by 0x4E7051F: virStateInitialize (libvirt.c:827) >==8916== by 0x416409: main (qemud.c:859) >==8916== Address 0x63a90b0 is 0 bytes after a block of size 0 alloc'd >==8916== at 0x4A04481: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418) >==8916== by 0x4E56DDB: virAllocN (memory.c:128) >==8916== by 0x43A705: qemudCapsInitGuest (qemu_conf.c:659) >==8916== by 0x43AA4E: qemudCapsInit (qemu_conf.c:823) >==8916== by 0x435D81: qemudStartup (qemu_driver.c:568) >==8916== by 0x4E7051F: virStateInitialize (libvirt.c:827) >==8916== by 0x416409: main (qemud.c:859) >==8916== >14:47:25.511: warning : virEventUpdateHandleImpl:149 : Ignoring invalid update watch -1 >14:47:27.480: warning : qemudDispatchSignalEvent:361 : Shutting down on signal 2 >==8916== Invalid read of size 8 >==8916== at 0x4E7321F: virCapabilitiesFreeGuest (capabilities.c:120) >==8916== by 0x4E7355B: virCapabilitiesFree (capabilities.c:158) >==8916== by 0x426AE5: qemudShutdown (qemu_driver.c:745) >==8916== by 0x4E650FD: virStateCleanup (libvirt.c:845) >==8916== by 0x41652D: main (qemud.c:2303) >==8916== Address 0x63a90b0 is 0 bytes after a block of size 0 alloc'd >==8916== at 0x4A04481: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418) >==8916== by 0x4E56DDB: virAllocN (memory.c:128) >==8916== by 0x43A705: qemudCapsInitGuest (qemu_conf.c:659) >==8916== by 0x43AA4E: qemudCapsInit (qemu_conf.c:823) >==8916== by 0x435D81: qemudStartup (qemu_driver.c:568) >==8916== by 0x4E7051F: virStateInitialize (libvirt.c:827) >==8916== by 0x416409: main (qemud.c:859) >==8916== >==8916== >==8916== HEAP SUMMARY: >==8916== in use at exit: 102,607 bytes in 928 blocks >==8916== total heap usage: 1,058,406 allocs, 1,057,478 frees, 381,093,699 bytes allocated >==8916== >==8916== 5 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 15 of 534 >==8916== at 0x4A0515D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195) >==8916== by 0x317527EA01: strdup (strdup.c:43) >==8916== by 0x318C22BCCB: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C22BD94: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C23A385: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C21341A: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== >==8916== 5 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 16 of 534 >==8916== at 0x4A0515D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195) >==8916== by 0x317527EA01: strdup (strdup.c:43) >==8916== by 0x318C22BAAB: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C22BB63: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C23A385: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C21341A: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== >==8916== 6 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 29 of 534 >==8916== at 0x4A0515D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195) >==8916== by 0x317527EA01: strdup (strdup.c:43) >==8916== by 0x318C22BAAB: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C23A385: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C21341A: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== >==8916== 7 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 42 of 534 >==8916== at 0x4A0515D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195) >==8916== by 0x317527EA01: strdup (strdup.c:43) >==8916== by 0x318C22BCCB: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C22BD61: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C23A385: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C21341A: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== >==8916== 7 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 43 of 534 >==8916== at 0x4A0515D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195) >==8916== by 0x317527EA01: strdup (strdup.c:43) >==8916== by 0x318C22BCCB: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C22BD83: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C23A385: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C21341A: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== >==8916== 7 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 44 of 534 >==8916== at 0x4A0515D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195) >==8916== by 0x317527EA01: strdup (strdup.c:43) >==8916== by 0x318C22BCCB: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C23A385: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C21341A: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== >==8916== 7 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 45 of 534 >==8916== at 0x4A0515D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195) >==8916== by 0x317527EA01: strdup (strdup.c:43) >==8916== by 0x318C22BAAB: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C22BB41: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C23A385: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C21341A: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== >==8916== 8 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 84 of 534 >==8916== at 0x4A0515D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195) >==8916== by 0x317527EA01: strdup (strdup.c:43) >==8916== by 0x318C22BAAB: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C22BB52: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C23A385: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C21341A: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== >==8916== 9 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 101 of 534 >==8916== at 0x4A0515D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195) >==8916== by 0x317527EA01: strdup (strdup.c:43) >==8916== by 0x318C22BCCB: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C22BD72: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C23A385: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C21341A: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== >==8916== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 205 of 534 >==8916== at 0x4A04481: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418) >==8916== by 0x318C22BCB7: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C22BD61: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C23A385: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C21341A: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== >==8916== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 206 of 534 >==8916== at 0x4A04481: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418) >==8916== by 0x318C22BCB7: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C22BD72: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C23A385: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C21341A: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== >==8916== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 207 of 534 >==8916== at 0x4A04481: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418) >==8916== by 0x318C22BCB7: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C22BD83: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C23A385: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C21341A: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== >==8916== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 208 of 534 >==8916== at 0x4A04481: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418) >==8916== by 0x318C22BCB7: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C22BD94: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C23A385: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C21341A: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== >==8916== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 209 of 534 >==8916== at 0x4A04481: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418) >==8916== by 0x318C22BCB7: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C23A385: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C21341A: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== >==8916== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 210 of 534 >==8916== at 0x4A04481: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418) >==8916== by 0x318C22BA97: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C22BB41: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C23A385: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C21341A: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== >==8916== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 211 of 534 >==8916== at 0x4A04481: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418) >==8916== by 0x318C22BA97: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C22BB52: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C23A385: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C21341A: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== >==8916== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 212 of 534 >==8916== at 0x4A04481: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418) >==8916== by 0x318C22BA97: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C22BB63: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C23A385: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C21341A: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== >==8916== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 213 of 534 >==8916== at 0x4A04481: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418) >==8916== by 0x318C22BA97: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C23A385: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318C21341A: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== >==8916== 264 (56 direct, 208 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 484 of 534 >==8916== at 0x4A04481: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418) >==8916== by 0x318C21D927: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318D207C31: netlink_init (dutil.c:501) >==8916== by 0x318D206BF0: drv_init (drv_initscripts.c:497) >==8916== by 0x45FF1C: interfaceOpenInterface (interface_driver.c:135) >==8916== by 0x4E7193B: do_open (libvirt.c:1092) >==8916== by 0x43469E: qemudAutostartConfigs (qemu_driver.c:243) >==8916== by 0x436044: qemudStartup (qemu_driver.c:649) >==8916== by 0x4E7051F: virStateInitialize (libvirt.c:827) >==8916== by 0x416409: main (qemud.c:859) >==8916== >==8916== 264 (56 direct, 208 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 485 of 534 >==8916== at 0x4A04481: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418) >==8916== by 0x318C21D927: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318D207C31: netlink_init (dutil.c:501) >==8916== by 0x318D206BF0: drv_init (drv_initscripts.c:497) >==8916== by 0x45FF1C: interfaceOpenInterface (interface_driver.c:135) >==8916== by 0x4E7193B: do_open (libvirt.c:1092) >==8916== by 0x449F7C: umlAutostartConfigs (uml_driver.c:125) >==8916== by 0x44A5EF: umlStartup (uml_driver.c:398) >==8916== by 0x4E7051F: virStateInitialize (libvirt.c:827) >==8916== by 0x416409: main (qemud.c:859) >==8916== >==8916== 18,216 (3,864 direct, 14,352 indirect) bytes in 69 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 534 of 534 >==8916== at 0x4A04481: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418) >==8916== by 0x318C21D927: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libnl.so.1.1) >==8916== by 0x318D207C31: netlink_init (dutil.c:501) >==8916== by 0x318D206BF0: drv_init (drv_initscripts.c:497) >==8916== by 0x45FF1C: interfaceOpenInterface (interface_driver.c:135) >==8916== by 0x4E7193B: do_open (libvirt.c:1092) >==8916== by 0x41E3F8: remoteDispatchOpen (remote.c:159) >==8916== by 0x41F888: remoteDispatchClientCall (dispatch.c:466) >==8916== by 0x41FB6E: remoteDispatchClientRequest (dispatch.c:361) >==8916== by 0x4138CB: qemudWorker (qemud.c:1464) >==8916== by 0x3175E06A39: start_thread (pthread_create.c:297) >==8916== by 0x31752DDF3C: clone (clone.S:112) >==8916== >==8916== LEAK SUMMARY: >==8916== definitely lost: 3,976 bytes in 71 blocks >==8916== indirectly lost: 14,768 bytes in 71 blocks >==8916== possibly lost: 349 bytes in 18 blocks >==8916== still reachable: 83,514 bytes in 768 blocks >==8916== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks >==8916== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown. >==8916== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes >==8916== >==8916== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v >==8916== ERROR SUMMARY: 25 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 29 from 9)
You cannot view the attachment while viewing its details because your browser does not support IFRAMEs.
View the attachment on a separate page
.
View Attachment As Raw
Actions:
View
Attachments on
bug 540330
:
373258
|
374703
|
374740
|
374752
|
374766
| 374865 |
375011