Attachment 585872 Details for Bug 818317 – review.txt

review.txt

php-channel-digitalsandwich-review.txt (text/plain), 6.16 KB, created by Remi Collet on 2012-05-21 18:28:36 UTC

(hide)

Description:

Filename:

MIME Type:

Creator: Remi Collet

Created: 2012-05-21 18:28:36 UTC

Size: 6.16 KB

patch

obsolete

>
>Package Review
>==============
>
>Key:
>- = N/A
>x = Pass
>! = Fail
>? = Not evaluated
>
>
>
>==== Generic ====
>[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
>     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
>     Guidelines.
>[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
>     least one supported primary architecture.
>[-]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
>[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
>     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
>[!]: MUST Buildroot is not present
>     Note: Buildroot is not needed unless packager plans to package for EPEL5
>[-]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
>[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
>[!]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
>     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
>     Note: Clean is needed only if supporting EPEL
>[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
>[!]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
>     Note: defattr(....) present in %files section. This is OK if packaging
>     for EPEL5. Otherwise not needed
>[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
>[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
>[-]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
>[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
>[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
>[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
>[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
>[!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
>     beginning of %install.
>     Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5
>[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
>[-]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
>     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
>     license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
>[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
>[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
>     names).
>[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
>[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
>[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
>[-]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
>[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
>[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
>[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
>[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
>
>rpmlint php-channel-digitalsandwich-1.3-2.fc18.src.rpm
>
>php-channel-digitalsandwich.src:22: W: unversioned-explicit-provides php-channel(pear.digitalsandwich.com)
>1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
>
>
>rpmlint php-channel-digitalsandwich-1.3-2.fc18.noarch.rpm
>
>php-channel-digitalsandwich.noarch: W: no-documentation
>1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
>
>
>[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
>     provided in the spec URL.
>/home/extras/SPECS/review/818317/channel.xml :
>  MD5SUM this package     : 82c3bd950f4a117c3cd82a3a1ce3e67a
>  MD5SUM upstream package : 82c3bd950f4a117c3cd82a3a1ce3e67a
>
>[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
>[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
>     %{name}.spec.
>[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
>[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
>[-]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
>[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
>[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
>     separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
>     include it.
>[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
>[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
>     /usr/sbin.
>[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
>     --requires).
>Requires
>/bin/sh  
>/usr/bin/pear  
>php-pear(PEAR)  
>Provides
>php-channel(pear.digitalsandwich.com)  
>php-channel-digitalsandwich = 1.3-2.fc18
>[x]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
>[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
>[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
>     upstream.
>[x]: SHOULD Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
>[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
>[-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
>     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
>[-]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
>     architectures.
>[-]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
>[-]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
>     files.
>[x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.
>
>Issues:
>[!]: MUST Buildroot is not present
>     Note: Buildroot is not needed unless packager plans to package for EPEL5
>See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
>[!]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
>     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
>     Note: Clean is needed only if supporting EPEL
>See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean
>[!]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
>     Note: defattr(....) present in %files section. This is OK if packaging
>     for EPEL5. Otherwise not needed
>See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FilePermissions
>[!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
>     beginning of %install.
>     Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5
>See: None
>[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
>
>rpmlint php-channel-digitalsandwich-1.3-2.fc18.src.rpm
>
>php-channel-digitalsandwich.src:22: W: unversioned-explicit-provides php-channel(pear.digitalsandwich.com)
>1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
>
>
>rpmlint php-channel-digitalsandwich-1.3-2.fc18.noarch.rpm
>
>php-channel-digitalsandwich.noarch: W: no-documentation
>1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
>
>
>See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint
>
>
>Generated by fedora-review 0.1.3
>External plugins:

Actions: View

Attachments on bug 818317: 585872