Login
[x]
Log in using an account from:
Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Or login using a Red Hat Bugzilla account
Forgot Password
Login:
Hide Forgot
Create an Account
Red Hat Bugzilla – Attachment 612806 Details for
Bug 847517
Review Request: php-pear-Net-DNS2 - PHP Resolver library used to communicate with a DNS server
[?]
New
Simple Search
Advanced Search
My Links
Browse
Requests
Reports
Current State
Search
Tabular reports
Graphical reports
Duplicates
Other Reports
User Changes
Plotly Reports
Bug Status
Bug Severity
Non-Defaults
|
Product Dashboard
Help
Page Help!
Bug Writing Guidelines
What's new
Browser Support Policy
5.0.4.rh83 Release notes
FAQ
Guides index
User guide
Web Services
Contact
Legal
This site requires JavaScript to be enabled to function correctly, please enable it.
Generated by fedora-review 0.2.2 (9f8c0e5) last change: 2012-08-09
php-pear-Net-DNS2-review.txt (text/plain), 6.31 KB, created by
Shawn Iwinski
on 2012-09-14 10:53:23 UTC
(
hide
)
Description:
Generated by fedora-review 0.2.2 (9f8c0e5) last change: 2012-08-09
Filename:
MIME Type:
Creator:
Shawn Iwinski
Created:
2012-09-14 10:53:23 UTC
Size:
6.31 KB
patch
obsolete
> >Package Review >============== > >Key: >- = N/A >x = Pass >! = Fail >? = Not evaluated > > > >==== Generic ==== >[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. > Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). >[x]: EXTRA Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. >[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets > other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging > Guidelines. >[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at > least one supported primary architecture. >[-]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. >[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any > that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. >[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries. >[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format. >[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content. >[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 > Note: defattr(....) present in %files section. This is OK if packaging > for EPEL5. Otherwise not needed >[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. >[-]: MUST Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. >[-]: MUST Development files must be in a -devel package >[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses. >[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. >[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. >[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly. >[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files. >[x]: MUST Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines >[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. >[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the > beginning of %install. > Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5 >[x]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. >[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the > license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the > license(s) for the package is included in %doc. >[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: > "BSD (2 clause)", "Perl BSD (2 clause)" For detailed output of > licensecheck see file: /home/siwinski/projects/fedora/reviews/847517-php- > pear-Net-DNS2/licensecheck.txt >[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory > names). >[x]: MUST Package is named using only allowed ascii characters. >[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. >[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict. > Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s) >[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. >[-]: MUST If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and > Provides are present. >[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates. >[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. >[x]: MUST Package installs properly. >[x]: MUST Package is not relocatable. >[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary. >[x]: MUST Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. > Note: No rpmlint messages. >[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as > provided in the spec URL. >[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English. >[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format > %{name}.spec. >[-]: MUST Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. >[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8. >[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. >[x]: SHOULD Buildroot is not present > Note: Buildroot is not needed unless packager plans to package for EPEL5 >[x]: SHOULD Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) > Note: Clean is needed only if supporting EPEL5 >[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a > separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to > include it. >[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present. >[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, > /usr/sbin. >[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q > --requires). >[x]: SHOULD Package functions as described. >[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged. >[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from > upstream. >[x]: SHOULD Scriptlets must be sane, if used. >[x]: SHOULD SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. >[x]: SHOULD SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}. > Note: Source0 (Net_DNS2-1.2.3.tgz) > > Matches standard upstream naming convention. > >[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL. >[-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains > translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. >[x]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported > architectures. >[x]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass. >[x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed > files. >[x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define. > > >==== PHP ==== >[x]: MUST Package requires php-common instead of php. > >Issues: > >Rpmlint >------- >Checking: php-pear-Net-DNS2-1.2.3-1.fc17.src.rpm > php-pear-Net-DNS2-1.2.3-1.fc17.noarch.rpm >2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > > >Rpmlint (installed packages) >---------------------------- >Cannot parse rpmlint output: >Requires >-------- >php-pear-Net-DNS2-1.2.3-1.fc17.noarch.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): > > /bin/sh > /usr/bin/pear > php-ctype > php-date > php-json > php-mhash > php-openssl > php-pcre > php-pear(PEAR) > php-shmop > php-sockets > php-spl > >Provides >-------- >php-pear-Net-DNS2-1.2.3-1.fc17.noarch.rpm: > > php-pear(Net_DNS2) = 1.2.3 > php-pear-Net-DNS2 = 1.2.3-1.fc17 > >MD5-sum check >------------- >http://pear.php.net/get/Net_DNS2-1.2.3.tgz : > CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : c0dc86d619db80d11d03c5f57d01e1d81713cb1fe730d6f8ada2c8d419f5f121 > CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : c0dc86d619db80d11d03c5f57d01e1d81713cb1fe730d6f8ada2c8d419f5f121 > > >Generated by fedora-review 0.2.2 (9f8c0e5) last change: 2012-08-09 >Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 847517 >External plugins:
You cannot view the attachment while viewing its details because your browser does not support IFRAMEs.
View the attachment on a separate page
.
View Attachment As Raw
Actions:
View
Attachments on
bug 847517
: 612806