Login
[x]
Log in using an account from:
Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Or login using a Red Hat Bugzilla account
Forgot Password
Login:
Hide Forgot
Create an Account
Red Hat Bugzilla – Attachment 649998 Details for
Bug 879187
NFS in RC1 regressed vs. TC9: does not override inst.stage2 when passed as inst.repo, interactive NFS is impossible
[?]
New
Simple Search
Advanced Search
My Links
Browse
Requests
Reports
Current State
Search
Tabular reports
Graphical reports
Duplicates
Other Reports
User Changes
Plotly Reports
Bug Status
Bug Severity
Non-Defaults
|
Product Dashboard
Help
Page Help!
Bug Writing Guidelines
What's new
Browser Support Policy
5.0.4.rh83 Release notes
FAQ
Guides index
User guide
Web Services
Contact
Legal
This site requires JavaScript to be enabled to function correctly, please enable it.
IRC log extract from when we discussed applying this patch (for forensic purposes)
file_879187.txt (text/plain), 3.47 KB, created by
Adam Williamson
on 2012-11-22 19:05:30 UTC
(
hide
)
Description:
IRC log extract from when we discussed applying this patch (for forensic purposes)
Filename:
MIME Type:
Creator:
Adam Williamson
Created:
2012-11-22 19:05:30 UTC
Size:
3.47 KB
patch
obsolete
>20-11-2012 11:29:34 < bcl!~bcl@neil.brianlane.com: jlk: you left an import pdb in that patch for 876897 >20-11-2012 11:29:49 < jlk!~jkeating@fedora/ender: haha >20-11-2012 11:29:50 < jlk!~jkeating@fedora/ender: whoops >20-11-2012 11:30:01 < bcl!~bcl@neil.brianlane.com: brown m&m's, right? >20-11-2012 11:30:06 < jlk!~jkeating@fedora/ender: sure, that's it >20-11-2012 11:30:30 < jlk!~jkeating@fedora/ender: fixed locally >20-11-2012 11:32:09 < bcl!~bcl@neil.brianlane.com: ack otherwise. >20-11-2012 11:32:29 < jlk!~jkeating@fedora/ender: pushing / picking >20-11-2012 11:32:31 < jlk!~jkeating@fedora/ender: pushing >20-11-2012 11:33:11 < bcl!~bcl@neil.brianlane.com: yeah, that's a beta nth to pick it to f18-beta2-branch as well. >20-11-2012 11:33:11 < jlk!~jkeating@fedora/ender: vunderbar. Conflicts >20-11-2012 11:33:17 < bcl!~bcl@neil.brianlane.com: whee :) >20-11-2012 11:33:56 < jlk!~jkeating@fedora/ender: oh right, this also requires a commit I did that added some constants >20-11-2012 11:34:06 < dlehman!~dlehman@67.58.72.173: adamw: apparently it's easier to hit 877871 than I thought. if you mark an existing LV whose PVs are encrypted for reformat you can/will hit it >20-11-2012 11:34:36 < jlk!~jkeating@fedora/ender: We'll have to cherry pick over 98538bb89f3c82babf86dcaf2936ba08a67fd08d which fixes nfsiso stuff too >20-11-2012 11:34:47 < dlehman!~dlehman@67.58.72.173: adamw: but I can add a trivial fix for that case to the other bug's patch. the ui-twiddling can be handled separately post-beta. >20-11-2012 11:34:53 < bcl!~bcl@neil.brianlane.com: if it depends on it that's fine with me. >20-11-2012 11:35:03 < jlk!~jkeating@fedora/ender: that also resolves the conflict :) >20-11-2012 11:35:15 < tflink!~tflink@redhat/tflink: wwoods: can you make an update for the new fedup-dracut builds if they're ready? The new lorax is likely to be used for the next TC/RC and I'd like to try using a more official repo for fedup testing >20-11-2012 11:36:38 < jlk!~jkeating@fedora/ender: is smoke 22 built from the beta2 branch? >20-11-2012 11:37:07 < tflink!~tflink@redhat/tflink: jlk: not sure. I pulled in the anaconda-18.30-1 scratch build that bcl did last night >20-11-2012 11:37:21 < tflink!~tflink@redhat/tflink: if that was built from the beta2 branch, then yes >20-11-2012 11:37:34 < jlk!~jkeating@fedora/ender: bcl: remember that question about confusing others? :) >20-11-2012 11:37:49 < dlehman!~dlehman@67.58.72.173: adamw: I know this probably seems like a mess, but when you have 8 patches in the works you can't always test them in isolation from each other and then again for every possible subset >20-11-2012 11:37:53 < bcl!~bcl@neil.brianlane.com: tflink: that's from master. beta builds will now be 18.29.X >20-11-2012 11:38:17 < bcl!~bcl@neil.brianlane.com: so smoke22 is much bettter than beta :) >20-11-2012 11:38:24 < tflink!~tflink@redhat/tflink: bcl: oh. ok. I probably shouldn't have pulled that in to the latest smoke build then >20-11-2012 11:38:35 < * tflink!~tflink@redhat/tflink learned something new today >20-11-2012 11:38:40 < bcl!~bcl@neil.brianlane.com: hey, makes me happy :) >20-11-2012 11:38:48 < bcl!~bcl@neil.brianlane.com: sorry for the confusion though. >20-11-2012 11:38:56 < tflink!~tflink@redhat/tflink: I was wondering why the numbering scheme changed all of a sudden >20-11-2012 11:39:11 < bcl!~bcl@neil.brianlane.com: The goal is to not get to a point where the stuff on master has had no testing. >20-11-2012 11:49:17 > adamw: dlehman: sure, i get that. go ahead and put that fix in.
You cannot view the attachment while viewing its details because your browser does not support IFRAMEs.
View the attachment on a separate page
.
View Attachment As Raw
Actions:
View
Attachments on
bug 879187
:
649611
|
649612
|
649613
|
649614
|
649615
|
649616
|
649617
|
649618
|
649619
|
649620
|
649621
|
649622
|
649623
|
649624
|
649625
|
649795
|
649796
|
649798
|
649799
|
649802
|
649803
|
649804
|
649805
| 649998 |
659293
|
659296