Back to bug 1031642
| Who | When | What | Removed | Added |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rostislav Svoboda | 2013-11-19 07:47:27 UTC | Severity | urgent | high |
| Alessio Soldano | 2013-11-26 14:21:39 UTC | Status | NEW | ASSIGNED |
| Alessio Soldano | 2014-02-14 13:30:17 UTC | Target Release | --- | EAP 6.3.0 |
| Alessio Soldano | 2014-02-14 13:34:00 UTC | Depends On | 1061340 | |
| Alessio Soldano | 2014-03-20 09:46:50 UTC | Status | ASSIGNED | POST |
| Alessio Soldano | 2014-03-20 09:48:48 UTC | Status | POST | MODIFIED |
| favrycio | 2014-04-03 14:19:05 UTC | CC | favrycio | |
| Flags | needinfo? | |||
| Alessio Soldano | 2014-04-03 14:46:16 UTC | Flags | needinfo? | |
| Kabir Khan | 2014-04-04 14:55:16 UTC | Status | MODIFIED | ON_QA |
| CC | kkhan | |||
| Target Milestone | --- | DR0 | ||
| Petr SakaĆ | 2014-04-08 10:45:13 UTC | Status | ON_QA | VERIFIED |
| Alessio Soldano | 2014-06-03 12:42:15 UTC | Doc Text | There was a bug preventing the ws stack from processing @WebService(wsdlLocation=...) when performing wsdl soap:address rewrite. The annotation attribute above was not processed when the annotation was put on service endpoint interfaces only. This is now fixed. | |
| Scott Mumford | 2014-06-04 02:48:33 UTC | CC | smumford | |
| Doc Text | There was a bug preventing the ws stack from processing @WebService(wsdlLocation=...) when performing wsdl soap:address rewrite. The annotation attribute above was not processed when the annotation was put on service endpoint interfaces only. This is now fixed. | Previous versions of JBoss EAP 6 carried a bug that prevented the WS stack from processing @WebService(wsdlLocation=...) when performing wsdl soap:address rewrite. The annotation attribute above was not processed when the annotation was put on service endpoint interfaces only. This issue has been corrected in this release. |
||
| John Skeoch | 2014-06-18 07:21:07 UTC | CC | nobody | |
| mark yarborough | 2014-06-28 15:42:08 UTC | Status | VERIFIED | CLOSED |
| Resolution | --- | CURRENTRELEASE | ||
| Last Closed | 2014-06-28 11:42:08 UTC |
Back to bug 1031642