Back to bug 1031783

Who When What Removed Added
Lalatendu Mohanty 2013-11-19 06:18:42 UTC Summary nt acl : User from a group which is part of AD is able to change the ownership of the folder and not for the files NT ACL : User is able to change the ownership of folder
Lalatendu Mohanty 2013-11-19 06:19:12 UTC Priority medium unspecified
Severity unspecified high
Poornima G 2013-12-11 09:56:40 UTC Blocks 1040355
Vivek Agarwal 2013-12-26 07:30:22 UTC Blocks 1035040
Vivek Agarwal 2014-01-03 08:49:48 UTC CC vagarwal
Assignee crh pgurusid
Shalaka 2014-01-03 08:59:54 UTC CC pgurusid, sharne
Flags needinfo?(pgurusid)
Poornima G 2014-01-03 11:14:04 UTC Flags needinfo?(pgurusid)
Poornima G 2014-01-07 04:19:39 UTC Status NEW ASSIGNED
Doc Text Cause: The NT ACLs are stored as xattrs of the files/directories. For the directories the xattrs are not rightly stored, because of a bug in distribute translator.

Consequence: In case of Red Hat Storage volumes exported by SAMBA, NT ACLs set on folders by a Microsoft Windows client will not behave as expected. Setting NT ACL on a Red Hat Storage volume itself is not a supported feature in this release.

Fix:

Result:
Poornima G 2014-01-07 05:30:51 UTC Doc Text Cause: The NT ACLs are stored as xattrs of the files/directories. For the directories the xattrs are not rightly stored, because of a bug in distribute translator.

Consequence: In case of Red Hat Storage volumes exported by SAMBA, NT ACLs set on folders by a Microsoft Windows client will not behave as expected. Setting NT ACL on a Red Hat Storage volume itself is not a supported feature in this release.

Fix:

Result:
Cause: The NT ACLs are stored as xattrs of the files/directories. For the directories the xattrs are not rightly stored, hence the NT ACLs for folders might not behave as expected.

Consequence: In case of Red Hat Storage volumes exported by SAMBA, NT ACLs set on folders by a Microsoft Windows client will not behave as expected. Setting NT ACL on a Red Hat Storage volume itself is not a supported feature in this release.

Workaround (if any): None

Result: The NT ACLs set on folders might not behave as expected.
Doc Type Bug Fix Known Issue
Shalaka 2014-02-19 07:19:20 UTC Doc Text Cause: The NT ACLs are stored as xattrs of the files/directories. For the directories the xattrs are not rightly stored, hence the NT ACLs for folders might not behave as expected.

Consequence: In case of Red Hat Storage volumes exported by SAMBA, NT ACLs set on folders by a Microsoft Windows client will not behave as expected. Setting NT ACL on a Red Hat Storage volume itself is not a supported feature in this release.

Workaround (if any): None

Result: The NT ACLs set on folders might not behave as expected.
If Red Hat Storage volumes are exported by samba, NT ACLs set on folders by a Microsoft Windows client does not behave as expected.
Flags needinfo?(pgurusid)
Poornima G 2014-02-19 09:30:47 UTC Doc Text If Red Hat Storage volumes are exported by samba, NT ACLs set on folders by a Microsoft Windows client does not behave as expected. If Red Hat Storage volumes are exported by samba, NT ACLs set on folders by Microsoft Windows clients does not behave as expected.
Flags needinfo?(pgurusid)
Raghavendra Talur 2014-02-24 12:53:34 UTC Priority unspecified high
Severity high medium
John Skeoch 2015-07-13 05:15:12 UTC CC rjoseph
Whiteboard ntacl
CC sharne asriram
Vivek Agarwal 2015-12-03 17:12:31 UTC Status ASSIGNED CLOSED
Resolution --- EOL
Last Closed 2015-12-03 12:12:31 UTC
Michael Adam 2016-02-23 09:08:00 UTC CC madam
Resolution EOL NOTABUG

Back to bug 1031783