Back to bug 1316594
| Who | When | What | Removed | Added |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Bugzilla Rules Engine | 2016-03-10 14:48:43 UTC | Target Release | --- | 8.0 |
| Sean Cohen | 2016-03-10 14:49:24 UTC | Keywords | FutureFeature | |
| Priority | unspecified | medium | ||
| Status | NEW | POST | ||
| Target Release | 8.0 | 9.0 | ||
| Red Hat Bugzilla | 2016-03-10 14:49:24 UTC | Doc Type | Bug Fix | Enhancement |
| Sat6QE Jenkins | 2016-03-28 20:15:54 UTC | Status | POST | MODIFIED |
| Mike McCune | 2016-03-28 23:47:57 UTC | Status | MODIFIED | POST |
| John Skeoch | 2016-04-18 07:43:33 UTC | CC | yeylon | srevivo |
| Perry Myers | 2016-04-19 00:43:12 UTC | CC | pmyers | |
| Scott Lewis | 2016-04-22 12:42:20 UTC | Target Milestone | --- | ga |
| Mike Abrams | 2016-06-07 06:46:10 UTC | CC | mabrams | |
| Jason Joyce | 2016-06-17 14:30:06 UTC | CC | jjoyce | |
| Pete Zaitcev | 2016-07-22 21:36:32 UTC | Doc Text | Feature: Improved replica placement and protection from duplicated assignments Reason: In the traditional Swift layout, accidentally assigning two repricas of a partition to the same device results in a silent reduction of durability. Result: Duplicate assignments are prevented, thus adhering to calculated guarantees. However, since obviously this requires the number of devices to be no less than the number of replicas, it is possible for certain incorrect old rings to be considered invalid. It is still possible to have the number of zones smaller than number of replicas. |
|
| Jason Joyce | 2016-07-29 18:42:22 UTC | Status | POST | MODIFIED |
| Fixed In Version | openstack-swift-2.7.0-2.el7ost | |||
| errata-xmlrpc | 2016-07-29 20:19:48 UTC | Status | MODIFIED | ON_QA |
| nlevinki | 2016-07-31 07:50:07 UTC | QA Contact | nlevinki | mabrams |
| Martin Lopes | 2016-08-05 04:51:02 UTC | CC | mlopes | |
| Doc Text | Feature: Improved replica placement and protection from duplicated assignments Reason: In the traditional Swift layout, accidentally assigning two repricas of a partition to the same device results in a silent reduction of durability. Result: Duplicate assignments are prevented, thus adhering to calculated guarantees. However, since obviously this requires the number of devices to be no less than the number of replicas, it is possible for certain incorrect old rings to be considered invalid. It is still possible to have the number of zones smaller than number of replicas. | This enhancement adds improved replica placement, and protection from duplicated assignments. Thi was added because, in the traditional Swift layout, the act of accidentally assigning two replicas of a partition to the same device resulted in a silent reduction of durability. As a result, duplicate assignments are prevented, thereby adhering to calculated guarantees. However, since this requires the number of devices to be no less than the number of replicas, it is possible for certain incorrect old rings to be considered invalid. Consequently, it is still possible to have the number of zones be smaller than the number of replicas. |
||
| Martin Lopes | 2016-08-05 04:51:39 UTC | Doc Text | This enhancement adds improved replica placement, and protection from duplicated assignments. Thi was added because, in the traditional Swift layout, the act of accidentally assigning two replicas of a partition to the same device resulted in a silent reduction of durability. As a result, duplicate assignments are prevented, thereby adhering to calculated guarantees. However, since this requires the number of devices to be no less than the number of replicas, it is possible for certain incorrect old rings to be considered invalid. Consequently, it is still possible to have the number of zones be smaller than the number of replicas. | This enhancement adds improved replica placement, and protection from duplicated assignments. This was added because, in the traditional Swift layout, the act of accidentally assigning two replicas of a partition to the same device resulted in a silent reduction of durability. As a result, duplicate assignments are prevented, thereby adhering to calculated guarantees. However, since this requires the number of devices to be no less than the number of replicas, it is possible for certain incorrect old rings to be considered invalid. Consequently, it is still possible to have the number of zones be smaller than the number of replicas. |
| Mike Abrams | 2016-08-07 06:35:36 UTC | Status | ON_QA | VERIFIED |
| errata-xmlrpc | 2016-08-11 01:50:52 UTC | Status | VERIFIED | RELEASE_PENDING |
| errata-xmlrpc | 2016-08-11 12:14:53 UTC | Status | RELEASE_PENDING | CLOSED |
| Resolution | --- | ERRATA | ||
| Last Closed | 2016-08-11 08:14:53 UTC |
Back to bug 1316594