Back to bug 1578820

Who When What Removed Added
Chris Feist 2018-08-23 20:11:06 UTC Blocks 1621899
Ken Gaillot 2019-03-27 21:00:58 UTC Priority unspecified low
Target Milestone rc pre-dev-freeze
Severity unspecified medium
Andrew Beekhof 2020-01-16 22:23:26 UTC CC abeekhof
Ken Gaillot 2020-05-06 00:26:53 UTC Pool ID sst_high_availability_rhel_7 sst_high_availability_rhel_8
Component pacemaker pacemaker
Version 7.5 8.3
Product Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Target Milestone pre-dev-freeze rc
Red Hat One Jira (issues.redhat.com) 2020-12-02 13:42:30 UTC Link ID Red Hat Issue Tracker - Private RHELPLAN-42515
RHEL Program Management 2021-01-08 07:29:26 UTC Status NEW CLOSED
Resolution --- WONTFIX
Last Closed 2021-01-08 07:29:26 UTC
Tomas Jelinek 2023-01-23 16:08:47 UTC Status CLOSED NEW
Resolution WONTFIX ---
Keywords Reopened
Ken Gaillot 2023-02-07 23:29:57 UTC Target Release --- 8.9
Status NEW ASSIGNED
Doc Type If docs needed, set a value Bug Fix
Doc Text Cause: When checking where a bundle with a single replica was active, crm_resource would count both the node where the container was active, and the guest node created for the container itself.

Consequence: crm_resource would refuse to ban or move a bundle with a single active replica.

Fix: crm_resource now only counts where a bundle's containers are active.

Result: crm_resource allows banning or moving a bundle with only a single active replica.
Target Upstream Version 2.1.6
RHEL Program Management 2023-02-07 23:30:07 UTC Keywords Triaged
Ken Gaillot 2023-05-02 21:49:25 UTC Status ASSIGNED POST
Markéta Smazová 2023-05-16 12:37:36 UTC CC msmazova
Dean Jansa 2023-05-16 13:11:21 UTC Link ID Red Hat Issue Tracker CLUSTERQE-6690
Chris Lumens 2023-05-26 13:32:49 UTC Fixed In Version pacemaker-2.1.6-1.el8
Status POST MODIFIED
errata-xmlrpc 2023-05-26 13:39:48 UTC Status MODIFIED ON_QA
RESHMA K VIJAYAN 2023-06-06 14:21:28 UTC Link ID Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 6972370
CC revijaya
Markéta Smazová 2023-06-20 12:12:55 UTC Status ON_QA VERIFIED
Steven J. Levine 2023-06-29 16:26:33 UTC Flags needinfo?(kgaillot)
CC kgaillot, slevine
Ken Gaillot 2023-06-29 16:56:51 UTC Flags needinfo?(kgaillot)
Steven J. Levine 2023-07-07 18:56:16 UTC Doc Text Cause: When checking where a bundle with a single replica was active, crm_resource would count both the node where the container was active, and the guest node created for the container itself.

Consequence: crm_resource would refuse to ban or move a bundle with a single active replica.

Fix: crm_resource now only counts where a bundle's containers are active.

Result: crm_resource allows banning or moving a bundle with only a single active replica.
.The `crm_resource` command now allows banning or moving a bundle with only a single active replica

Previously, when the `crm_resource` command checked where a bundle with a single replica was active, it would count both the node where the container was active and the guest node created for the container itself. As a consequence, the `crm_resource` command would not ban or move a bundle with a single active replica. With this fix, the `crm_resource` command now only counts where a bundle's containers are active.
Steven J. Levine 2023-07-27 14:48:09 UTC Docs Contact slevine
Steven J. Levine 2023-08-10 15:22:31 UTC Doc Text .The `crm_resource` command now allows banning or moving a bundle with only a single active replica

Previously, when the `crm_resource` command checked where a bundle with a single replica was active, it would count both the node where the container was active and the guest node created for the container itself. As a consequence, the `crm_resource` command would not ban or move a bundle with a single active replica. With this fix, the `crm_resource` command now only counts where a bundle's containers are active.
.The `crm_resource` command now allows banning or moving a bundle with only a single active replica

Previously, when the `crm_resource` command checked where a bundle with a single replica was active, it counted both the node where the container was active and the guest node that was created for the container itself. As a result, the `crm_resource` command would not ban or move a bundle with a single active replica. With this fix, the `crm_resource` command now only counts where a bundle's containers are active.
Flags needinfo?(kgaillot)
Ken Gaillot 2023-08-10 15:36:38 UTC Flags needinfo?(kgaillot)
Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-08-10 15:41:37 UTC QA Contact cluster-qe cluster-qe
Steven J. Levine 2023-08-10 16:33:18 UTC Doc Text .The `crm_resource` command now allows banning or moving a bundle with only a single active replica

Previously, when the `crm_resource` command checked where a bundle with a single replica was active, it counted both the node where the container was active and the guest node that was created for the container itself. As a result, the `crm_resource` command would not ban or move a bundle with a single active replica. With this fix, the `crm_resource` command now only counts where a bundle's containers are active.
.The `crm_resource` command now allows banning or moving a bundle with only a single active replica

Previously, when the `crm_resource` command checked where a bundle with a single replica was active, it counted both the node where the container was active and the guest node that was created for the container itself. As a result, the `crm_resource` command would not ban or move a bundle with a single active replica. With this fix, the `crm_resource` command now only counts where a bundle's containers are active when determining the number of active replicas.
Steven J. Levine 2023-08-11 14:42:57 UTC Doc Text .The `crm_resource` command now allows banning or moving a bundle with only a single active replica

Previously, when the `crm_resource` command checked where a bundle with a single replica was active, it counted both the node where the container was active and the guest node that was created for the container itself. As a result, the `crm_resource` command would not ban or move a bundle with a single active replica. With this fix, the `crm_resource` command now only counts where a bundle's containers are active when determining the number of active replicas.
.The `crm_resource` command now allows banning or moving a bundle with only a single active replica

Previously, when the `crm_resource` command checked where a bundle with a single replica was active, it counted both the node where the container was active and the guest node that was created for the container itself. As a result, the `crm_resource` command would not ban or move a bundle with a single active replica. With this fix, the `crm_resource` command now only counts nodes where a bundle's containers are active when determining the number of active replicas.
Steven J. Levine 2023-08-11 14:46:32 UTC Doc Text .The `crm_resource` command now allows banning or moving a bundle with only a single active replica

Previously, when the `crm_resource` command checked where a bundle with a single replica was active, it counted both the node where the container was active and the guest node that was created for the container itself. As a result, the `crm_resource` command would not ban or move a bundle with a single active replica. With this fix, the `crm_resource` command now only counts nodes where a bundle's containers are active when determining the number of active replicas.
.The `crm_resource` command now allows banning or moving a bundle with only a single active replica

Previously, when the `crm_resource` command checked where a bundle with a single replica was active, the command counted both the node where the container was active and the guest node that was created for the container itself. As a result, the `crm_resource` command would not ban or move a bundle with a single active replica. With this fix, the `crm_resource` command now only counts nodes where a bundle's containers are active when determining the number of active replicas.

Back to bug 1578820