Back to bug 1654660

Who When What Removed Added
Red Hat Bugzilla Rules Engine 2018-11-29 11:19:02 UTC Keywords FutureFeature
Target Release 3.0 3.*
Pasi Karkkainen 2019-01-02 21:04:46 UTC CC pasik
Victor Hernando 2019-02-13 08:57:34 UTC CC vhernand
Giridhar Ramaraju 2019-08-05 13:11:52 UTC QA Contact ceph-qe-bugs hgurav
Hemant G 2019-08-06 09:06:59 UTC QA Contact hgurav tchandra
Mike Hackett 2019-08-14 15:36:01 UTC CC flucifre, mhackett
Flags needinfo?(flucifre)
Tejas 2019-08-22 13:18:43 UTC Target Release 3.* 4.*
Federico Lucifredi 2020-01-23 04:07:47 UTC Version 3.1 5.0
Flags needinfo?(flucifre)
Mikel Olasagasti 2020-03-25 12:52:27 UTC Link ID Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 2109351
Veera Raghava Reddy 2020-11-04 18:04:18 UTC CC vereddy
Drew Harris 2020-11-13 13:32:10 UTC Target Milestone rc ---
Mike Hackett 2021-10-05 13:16:26 UTC Version 5.0 3.1
Target Release 4.* 5.1
Red Hat One Jira (issues.redhat.com) 2021-10-05 13:17:20 UTC Link ID Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-1972
Christina Meno 2021-10-13 15:29:01 UTC CC gmeno
Flags needinfo?(flucifre) needinfo?(mhackett)
Sebastian Wagner 2021-10-13 15:31:56 UTC CC sewagner
Sebastian Wagner 2021-10-13 15:33:51 UTC Assignee ceph-eng-bugs sewagner
Docs Contact knortema
QA Contact tchandra sunnagar
Component Distribution Cephadm
Sebastian Wagner 2021-11-04 13:15:18 UTC CC tserlin
Flags needinfo?(tserlin)
Sebastian Wagner 2021-11-04 16:17:24 UTC Status NEW POST
errata-xmlrpc 2021-11-05 05:16:44 UTC Status POST MODIFIED
Fixed In Version ceph-16.2.6-2.el8cp
Flags needinfo?(tserlin)
Status MODIFIED ON_QA
Rahul Lepakshi 2021-11-11 08:03:44 UTC CC rlepaksh
Rahul Lepakshi 2021-11-12 05:07:43 UTC QA Contact sunnagar rlepaksh
Rahul Lepakshi 2021-12-17 07:25:19 UTC Status ON_QA VERIFIED
Aron Gunn 2022-01-10 23:13:20 UTC Docs Contact knortema
CC agunn
Aron Gunn 2022-01-11 22:45:12 UTC Blocks 2031073
Aron Gunn 2022-01-24 19:50:01 UTC Doc Type If docs needed, set a value Enhancement
Flags needinfo?(sewagner)
Docs Contact agunn
Sebastian Wagner 2022-01-27 09:10:36 UTC Flags needinfo?(flucifre) needinfo?(mhackett) needinfo?(sewagner)
Doc Text Cephadm supports the deployment of multiple daemons on the same host:

.. code-block:: yaml

service_type: rgw
placement:
label: rgw
count-per-host: 2

The main reason for deploying multiple daemons per host is an additional
performance benefit for running multiple RGW and MDS daemons on the same host.

In deployment scenarios with just a single host, cephadm still needs to deploy at least two MGR daemons. See mgr_standby_modules in the ceph-mgr administrator’s guide for further details.
Red Hat Bugzilla 2022-01-31 23:32:23 UTC Assignee sewagner adking
CC sewagner
Ranjini M N 2022-02-16 05:37:42 UTC Flags needinfo?(adking)
CC adking, rmandyam
Doc Text Cephadm supports the deployment of multiple daemons on the same host:

.. code-block:: yaml

service_type: rgw
placement:
label: rgw
count-per-host: 2

The main reason for deploying multiple daemons per host is an additional
performance benefit for running multiple RGW and MDS daemons on the same host.

In deployment scenarios with just a single host, cephadm still needs to deploy at least two MGR daemons. See mgr_standby_modules in the ceph-mgr administrator’s guide for further details.
.`cephadm` supports colocating multiple daemons on the same host

With this release, multiple daemons, such as Ceph Object Gateway and Ceph Metadata Server (MDS), can be deployed on the same host thereby providing an additional performance benefit.

In deployment scenarios with just a single host, `cephadm` requires to deploy at least two Ceph Manager daemons.
Adam King 2022-02-16 18:24:29 UTC Flags needinfo?(adking) needinfo?(rmandyam)
Ranjini M N 2022-02-17 10:29:23 UTC Doc Text .`cephadm` supports colocating multiple daemons on the same host

With this release, multiple daemons, such as Ceph Object Gateway and Ceph Metadata Server (MDS), can be deployed on the same host thereby providing an additional performance benefit.

In deployment scenarios with just a single host, `cephadm` requires to deploy at least two Ceph Manager daemons.
.`cephadm` supports colocating multiple daemons on the same host

With this release, multiple daemons, such as Ceph Object Gateway and Ceph Metadata Server (MDS), can be deployed on the same host thereby providing an additional performance benefit.
+
.Example
----
service_type: rgw
placement:
label: rgw
count-per-host: 2
----

In deployment scenarios with just a single host, `cephadm` requires to deploy at least two Ceph Manager daemons.

For single node deployments, `cephadm` requires atleast 2 running Ceph Manager daemons in upgrade scenarios. It is still highly recommended even outside of upgrade scenarios but the storage cluster will function without it.
Ranjini M N 2022-02-21 07:05:44 UTC Flags needinfo?(rmandyam)
Adam King 2022-02-21 13:56:05 UTC Flags needinfo?(rmandyam)
Aron Gunn 2022-02-21 16:49:22 UTC Docs Contact agunn rmandyam
Ranjini M N 2022-02-22 07:01:53 UTC Flags needinfo?(rmandyam)
Doc Text .`cephadm` supports colocating multiple daemons on the same host

With this release, multiple daemons, such as Ceph Object Gateway and Ceph Metadata Server (MDS), can be deployed on the same host thereby providing an additional performance benefit.
+
.Example
----
service_type: rgw
placement:
label: rgw
count-per-host: 2
----

In deployment scenarios with just a single host, `cephadm` requires to deploy at least two Ceph Manager daemons.

For single node deployments, `cephadm` requires atleast 2 running Ceph Manager daemons in upgrade scenarios. It is still highly recommended even outside of upgrade scenarios but the storage cluster will function without it.
.`cephadm` supports colocating multiple daemons on the same host

With this release, multiple daemons, such as Ceph Object Gateway and Ceph Metadata Server (MDS), can be deployed on the same host thereby providing an additional performance benefit.
+
.Example
----
service_type: rgw
placement:
label: rgw
count-per-host: 2
----

For single node deployments, `cephadm` requires atleast two running Ceph Manager daemons in upgrade scenarios. It is still highly recommended even outside of upgrade scenarios but the storage cluster will function without it.
Ranjini M N 2022-03-08 16:26:13 UTC Doc Text .`cephadm` supports colocating multiple daemons on the same host

With this release, multiple daemons, such as Ceph Object Gateway and Ceph Metadata Server (MDS), can be deployed on the same host thereby providing an additional performance benefit.
+
.Example
----
service_type: rgw
placement:
label: rgw
count-per-host: 2
----

For single node deployments, `cephadm` requires atleast two running Ceph Manager daemons in upgrade scenarios. It is still highly recommended even outside of upgrade scenarios but the storage cluster will function without it.
.`cephadm` supports colocating multiple daemons on the same host

With this release, multiple daemons, such as Ceph Object Gateway and Ceph Metadata Server (MDS), can be deployed on the same host thereby providing an additional performance benefit.

.Example
----
service_type: rgw
placement:
label: rgw
count-per-host: 2
----

For single node deployments, `cephadm` requires atleast two running Ceph Manager daemons in upgrade scenarios. It is still highly recommended even outside of upgrade scenarios but the storage cluster will function without it.
errata-xmlrpc 2022-04-04 07:59:39 UTC Status VERIFIED RELEASE_PENDING
errata-xmlrpc 2022-04-04 10:19:51 UTC Status RELEASE_PENDING CLOSED
Resolution --- ERRATA
Last Closed 2022-04-04 10:19:51 UTC
errata-xmlrpc 2022-04-04 10:20:27 UTC Link ID Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2022:1174

Back to bug 1654660