Back to bug 1986160
| Who | When | What | Removed | Added |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaurav Sitlani | 2021-07-26 19:31:35 UTC | CC | ivancich | |
| Red Hat One Jira (issues.redhat.com) | 2021-07-26 19:31:54 UTC | Link ID | Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-627 | |
| Vidushi Mishra | 2021-07-26 19:32:13 UTC | CC | vimishra | |
| Gaurav Sitlani | 2021-07-26 19:51:00 UTC | Flags | needinfo?(ivancich) | |
| J. Eric Ivancich | 2021-07-27 03:01:16 UTC | Flags | needinfo?(ivancich) | needinfo?(mbenjamin) |
| Matt Benjamin (redhat) | 2021-07-28 12:45:23 UTC | Status | NEW | ASSIGNED |
| Assignee | mbenjamin | ivancich | ||
| J. Eric Ivancich | 2021-07-28 12:48:21 UTC | Flags | needinfo?(mbenjamin) | |
| Gaurav Sitlani | 2021-07-28 15:24:53 UTC | Flags | needinfo?(mbenjamin) | |
| Ranjini M N | 2021-07-29 04:50:51 UTC | CC | tserlin | |
| Flags | needinfo?(mbenjamin) | |||
| CC | rmandyam | |||
| Flags | needinfo?(rmandyam) | |||
| Flags | needinfo?(rmandyam) | needinfo?(ivancich) | ||
| Ranjini M N | 2021-08-03 10:16:30 UTC | Flags | needinfo?(ivancich) | |
| J. Eric Ivancich | 2021-08-03 16:18:55 UTC | Doc Text | Cause: When user stats are calculated, the "size_utilized" and "size_kb_utilized" fields are not computed and left at 0, and the 0 values are reported. Consequence: Users may wonder (be confused) why those two fields are reported as 0. Workaround (if any): Until fixed in a future version, users should ignore those two fields. Result: If they're ignored, they will presumably not cause wonder/confusion. | |
| Doc Type | If docs needed, set a value | Known Issue | ||
| Flags | needinfo?(ivancich) needinfo?(ivancich) | |||
| J. Eric Ivancich | 2021-08-03 16:22:47 UTC | Flags | needinfo?(rmandyam) | |
| Ranjini M N | 2021-08-04 05:32:18 UTC | Flags | needinfo?(rmandyam) | |
| Ranjini M N | 2021-08-04 11:39:47 UTC | Blocks | 1959686 | |
| J. Eric Ivancich | 2021-08-12 03:28:53 UTC | Status | ASSIGNED | MODIFIED |
| Ranjini M N | 2021-08-18 14:13:28 UTC | Doc Text | Cause: When user stats are calculated, the "size_utilized" and "size_kb_utilized" fields are not computed and left at 0, and the 0 values are reported. Consequence: Users may wonder (be confused) why those two fields are reported as 0. Workaround (if any): Until fixed in a future version, users should ignore those two fields. Result: If they're ignored, they will presumably not cause wonder/confusion. | .The `radosgw-admin user stats` command displays incorrect values for `size_utilized` and `size_kb_utilized` parameters When the user runs the `radosgw-admin user stats` command after adding the buckets to the {storage-product} cluster, the command displays incorrect values for `size_utilized` and `size_kb_utilized` parameters. There is no workaround for this issue and the users can ignore these values. |
| J. Eric Ivancich | 2021-08-18 20:13:52 UTC | Flags | needinfo?(rmandyam) | |
| Ranjini M N | 2021-08-19 05:10:51 UTC | Doc Text | .The `radosgw-admin user stats` command displays incorrect values for `size_utilized` and `size_kb_utilized` parameters When the user runs the `radosgw-admin user stats` command after adding the buckets to the {storage-product} cluster, the command displays incorrect values for `size_utilized` and `size_kb_utilized` parameters. There is no workaround for this issue and the users can ignore these values. | .The `radosgw-admin user stats` command displays incorrect values for the `size_utilized` and `size_kb_utilized` fields When a user runs the `radosgw-admin user stats` command after adding buckets to the {storage-product} cluster, the output displays incorrect values in the `size_utilized` and `size_kb_utilized` fields; they are always displayed as zero. There is no workaround for this issue and users can ignore these values. |
| Flags | needinfo?(rmandyam) | |||
| Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) | 2021-09-09 18:08:28 UTC | Link ID | Ceph Project Bug Tracker 52073 | |
| CC | kdreyer | |||
| Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) | 2021-10-06 14:21:04 UTC | Fixed In Version | ceph-16.2.6-2.el8cp | |
| errata-xmlrpc | 2021-10-06 14:23:48 UTC | Status | MODIFIED | ON_QA |
| Red Hat Bugzilla | 2021-12-09 06:36:03 UTC | CC | sweil | |
| Aron Gunn | 2022-01-18 23:15:48 UTC | Blocks | 2031073 | |
| CC | agunn | |||
| Madhavi Kasturi | 2022-01-19 12:09:19 UTC | CC | mkasturi | |
| QA Contact | tchandra | gsitlani | ||
| Aron Gunn | 2022-01-25 21:59:34 UTC | Docs Contact | agunn | |
| Gaurav Sitlani | 2022-02-07 08:09:59 UTC | Status | ON_QA | VERIFIED |
| Ranjini M N | 2022-02-16 07:50:21 UTC | Flags | needinfo?(ivancich) | |
| J. Eric Ivancich | 2022-02-16 21:50:37 UTC | Flags | needinfo?(ivancich) | |
| Ranjini M N | 2022-02-17 07:40:29 UTC | Doc Text | .The `radosgw-admin user stats` command displays incorrect values for the `size_utilized` and `size_kb_utilized` fields When a user runs the `radosgw-admin user stats` command after adding buckets to the {storage-product} cluster, the output displays incorrect values in the `size_utilized` and `size_kb_utilized` fields; they are always displayed as zero. There is no workaround for this issue and users can ignore these values. | .The `radosgw-admin user stats` command displays values for `size_utilized` and `size_kb_utilized` fields only when they are calculated Previously, when a user ran the `radosgw-admin user stats` command after adding buckets to the {storage-product} cluster, the output displayed incorrect values in the `size_utilized` and `size_kb_utilized` fields; they were always displayed as zero. With this release `size_utilized` and `size_kb_utilized` are only displayed when they are calculated to prevent incorrect values. |
| Doc Type | Known Issue | Bug Fix | ||
| Aron Gunn | 2022-02-21 17:34:59 UTC | Docs Contact | agunn | rmandyam |
| errata-xmlrpc | 2022-04-04 08:01:48 UTC | Status | VERIFIED | RELEASE_PENDING |
| errata-xmlrpc | 2022-04-04 10:21:20 UTC | Resolution | --- | ERRATA |
| Status | RELEASE_PENDING | CLOSED | ||
| Last Closed | 2022-04-04 10:21:20 UTC | |||
| errata-xmlrpc | 2022-04-04 10:21:40 UTC | Link ID | Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2022:1174 |
Back to bug 1986160