Back to bug 2028693
| Who | When | What | Removed | Added |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat One Jira (issues.redhat.com) | 2021-12-02 23:27:28 UTC | Link ID | Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-2491 | |
| Red Hat Bugzilla | 2022-01-31 23:32:21 UTC | Assignee | sewagner | adking |
| Manasa | 2022-03-10 07:07:17 UTC | CC | mgowri | |
| Adam King | 2022-05-11 14:45:54 UTC | Status | NEW | ASSIGNED |
| Assignee | adking | gabrioux | ||
| Veera Raghava Reddy | 2022-05-11 15:19:59 UTC | CC | vereddy | |
| Guillaume Abrioux | 2022-05-13 11:23:07 UTC | Component | Cephadm | Ceph-Ansible |
| Docs Contact | knortema | |||
| QA Contact | sunnagar | amsyedha | ||
| CC | aschoen, ceph-eng-bugs, ceph-qe-bugs, gmeno, nthomas, ykaul | |||
| Red Hat Bugzilla | 2022-05-26 08:30:19 UTC | CC | ceph-qe-bugs | |
| Guillaume Abrioux | 2022-05-27 08:04:00 UTC | Link ID | Github ceph/ceph-ansible/pull/7183 | |
| Guillaume Abrioux | 2022-05-30 14:45:32 UTC | Link ID | Github ceph/ceph-ansible/pull/7192 | |
| Status | ASSIGNED | POST | ||
| errata-xmlrpc | 2022-05-31 02:18:05 UTC | Fixed In Version | ceph-ansible-6.0.27.0-1.el8cp | |
| Status | POST | MODIFIED | ||
| CC | tserlin | |||
| Status | MODIFIED | ON_QA | ||
| Ameena Suhani S H | 2022-06-07 07:38:19 UTC | QA Contact | amsyedha | rkhambad |
| Rajendra Khambadkar | 2022-06-09 10:20:47 UTC | Flags | needinfo?(vumrao) | |
| Vikhyat Umrao | 2022-06-09 15:24:30 UTC | Flags | needinfo?(vumrao) | |
| Rajendra Khambadkar | 2022-06-10 05:42:44 UTC | Status | ON_QA | VERIFIED |
| Akash Raj | 2022-07-28 09:45:03 UTC | Blocks | 2102272 | |
| Akash Raj | 2022-07-28 09:45:35 UTC | CC | akraj, gabrioux | |
| Flags | needinfo?(gabrioux) | |||
| Blocks | 2102272 | |||
| Akash Raj | 2022-07-28 09:49:25 UTC | Blocks | 2102272 | |
| Guillaume Abrioux | 2022-07-29 08:29:15 UTC | Flags | needinfo?(gabrioux) | |
| Doc Type | If docs needed, set a value | Bug Fix | ||
| Doc Text | Cause: When migrating to cephadm, nothing sets a proper value for `autotune_memory_target_ratio` depending on the kind of deployment (hci or non-hci). Consequence: No ratio is set, so there's no difference between an hci deployment or a non-hci deployment. Fix: make cephadm-adopt playbook set the right ratio depending on the kind of deployment (hci/non-hci) Result: the right ratio is set for `autotune_memory_target_ratio` |
|||
| Akash Raj | 2022-08-03 14:22:29 UTC | Flags | needinfo?(gabrioux) | |
| Doc Text | Cause: When migrating to cephadm, nothing sets a proper value for `autotune_memory_target_ratio` depending on the kind of deployment (hci or non-hci). Consequence: No ratio is set, so there's no difference between an hci deployment or a non-hci deployment. Fix: make cephadm-adopt playbook set the right ratio depending on the kind of deployment (hci/non-hci) Result: the right ratio is set for `autotune_memory_target_ratio` | .Correct value is set for `autotune_memory_target_ratio` when migrating to `cephadm` Previously, when migrating to `cephadm`, nothing would set a proper value for `autotune_memory_target_ratio` depending on the kind of deployment, HCI or non_HCI. Due to this, no ratio was set and there would be no difference between the two deployments. With this fix, the `cephadm-adopt playbook` sets the right ratio depending on the kind of deployment and the right value is set for `autotune_memory_target_ratio` parameter. | ||
| Docs Contact | akraj | |||
| Guillaume Abrioux | 2022-08-03 14:45:37 UTC | Flags | needinfo?(gabrioux) | |
| errata-xmlrpc | 2022-08-09 09:55:18 UTC | Status | VERIFIED | RELEASE_PENDING |
| errata-xmlrpc | 2022-08-09 17:36:46 UTC | Resolution | --- | ERRATA |
| Status | RELEASE_PENDING | CLOSED | ||
| Last Closed | 2022-08-09 17:36:46 UTC | |||
| errata-xmlrpc | 2022-08-09 17:37:11 UTC | Link ID | Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2022:5997 |
Back to bug 2028693