Back to bug 2062456
| Who | When | What | Removed | Added |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amarnath | 2022-03-09 19:27:51 UTC | Target Release | 6.1 | 5.1 |
| Red Hat One Jira (issues.redhat.com) | 2022-03-09 19:29:40 UTC | Link ID | Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-3680 | |
| Red Hat One Jira (issues.redhat.com) | 2022-03-09 19:29:43 UTC | Link ID | Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCSDASH-689 | |
| Ernesto Puerta | 2022-03-16 19:21:51 UTC | Target Release | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Priority | unspecified | low | ||
| Matthias Muench | 2022-03-17 09:32:25 UTC | CC | mmuench | |
| Sunil Angadi | 2022-03-21 05:28:50 UTC | QA Contact | sangadi | amk |
| Ernesto Puerta | 2022-04-06 11:57:55 UTC | Target Release | 5.2 | 6.0 |
| Red Hat Bugzilla | 2022-05-26 08:30:51 UTC | CC | ceph-qe-bugs | |
| Ernesto Puerta | 2022-06-14 16:50:08 UTC | Status | NEW | ASSIGNED |
| Assignee | epuertat | nia | ||
| Nizamudeen | 2022-08-16 07:00:50 UTC | Status | ASSIGNED | POST |
| Link ID | Github ceph/ceph/pull/47571 | |||
| Nizamudeen | 2022-09-13 07:27:13 UTC | Status | POST | MODIFIED |
| errata-xmlrpc | 2022-09-13 15:50:13 UTC | Fixed In Version | ceph-17.2.3-28.el9cp | |
| CC | tserlin | |||
| Status | MODIFIED | ON_QA | ||
| Eliska | 2022-09-15 14:28:30 UTC | Flags | needinfo?(nia) | |
| CC | ekristov, nia | |||
| Nizamudeen | 2022-09-15 16:18:46 UTC | Doc Text | Cause: Squash is not a mandatory field. Also if export is created from the backend and specified a different kind of squash name, the form just populates with an empty field. Consequence: It was misleading in the UI Fix: Removed the required condition for the squash field for the nfs exports creation. Also fixed the squash field coming up as empty in the Edit form if the exports are created from backend Result: UI is aligned with the CLI way of nfs exports creation | |
| Doc Type | If docs needed, set a value | Bug Fix | ||
| Flags | needinfo?(nia) | |||
| Eliska | 2022-09-20 10:06:19 UTC | Blocks | 2126050 | |
| Eliska | 2022-09-21 13:30:36 UTC | Flags | needinfo?(nia) | |
| Docs Contact | asriram | ekristov | ||
| Doc Text | Cause: Squash is not a mandatory field. Also if export is created from the backend and specified a different kind of squash name, the form just populates with an empty field. Consequence: It was misleading in the UI Fix: Removed the required condition for the squash field for the nfs exports creation. Also fixed the squash field coming up as empty in the Edit form if the exports are created from backend Result: UI is aligned with the CLI way of nfs exports creation | .The Ceph Dashboard is now aligned with the command line interface’s (CLI) way of NFS exports creation Previously, the `squash` field for the NFS exports creation was shown as a mandatory field in the edit form. Additionally, if exports were created from the backend and specified a different kind of squash name, the form would return an empty field. With this fix, the `required` condition is removed from the `squash` field and the issue with the squash field coming up as empty in the edit form is also resolved. |
||
| Eliska | 2022-09-21 13:59:36 UTC | Doc Text | .The Ceph Dashboard is now aligned with the command line interface’s (CLI) way of NFS exports creation Previously, the `squash` field for the NFS exports creation was shown as a mandatory field in the edit form. Additionally, if exports were created from the backend and specified a different kind of squash name, the form would return an empty field. With this fix, the `required` condition is removed from the `squash` field and the issue with the squash field coming up as empty in the edit form is also resolved. | .The Ceph Dashboard is now aligned with the command line interface’s (CLI) way of NFS exports creation Previously, the `squash` field for the NFS exports creation was shown as a mandatory field in the edit form. Additionally, if exports were created from the backend and specified a different kind of squash name, the form would return an empty field. With this fix, the `required` condition is removed from the `squash` field and the issue with the squash field coming up as empty in the edit form is also resolved. |
| Nizamudeen | 2022-09-23 06:19:09 UTC | Flags | needinfo?(nia) | |
| Amarnath | 2022-09-26 13:39:39 UTC | Status | ON_QA | VERIFIED |
| Red Hat Bugzilla | 2022-12-31 19:54:19 UTC | CC | nia | |
| Assignee | nia | nobody | ||
| Red Hat Bugzilla | 2023-01-01 05:39:45 UTC | CC | tserlin | |
| Red Hat Bugzilla | 2023-01-01 08:28:30 UTC | QA Contact | amk | saraut |
| Red Hat Bugzilla | 2023-01-01 08:41:31 UTC | QA Contact | saraut | |
| Alasdair Kergon | 2023-01-04 04:36:31 UTC | QA Contact | amk | |
| Alasdair Kergon | 2023-01-04 05:00:47 UTC | Assignee | nobody | nia |
| Alasdair Kergon | 2023-01-04 05:20:55 UTC | CC | nia | |
| Alasdair Kergon | 2023-01-04 06:25:53 UTC | CC | tserlin | |
| Red Hat Bugzilla | 2023-01-09 08:31:01 UTC | CC | ceph-eng-bugs | |
| Alasdair Kergon | 2023-01-09 19:43:36 UTC | CC | ceph-eng-bugs | |
| errata-xmlrpc | 2023-03-20 18:37:32 UTC | Status | VERIFIED | RELEASE_PENDING |
| errata-xmlrpc | 2023-03-20 18:56:12 UTC | Resolution | --- | ERRATA |
| Status | RELEASE_PENDING | CLOSED | ||
| Last Closed | 2023-03-20 18:56:12 UTC | |||
| errata-xmlrpc | 2023-03-20 18:56:37 UTC | Link ID | Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2023:1360 |
Back to bug 2062456