Back to bug 2114501

Who When What Removed Added
Mudit Agarwal 2022-08-03 05:37:34 UTC CC kramdoss, muagarwa
Flags needinfo?(kramdoss)
gowtham 2022-08-03 05:52:58 UTC CC gshanmug
gowtham 2022-08-03 05:56:04 UTC Assignee nthomas gshanmug
gowtham 2022-08-03 05:56:15 UTC Status NEW ASSIGNED
gowtham 2022-08-03 08:02:26 UTC Severity urgent medium
Mudit Agarwal 2022-08-03 08:40:16 UTC Flags needinfo?(kramdoss)
gowtham 2022-08-03 09:08:20 UTC Target Release --- ODF 4.12.0
RHEL Program Management 2022-08-03 09:08:27 UTC Target Release ODF 4.12.0 ---
Aman Agrawal 2022-08-03 09:51:03 UTC Flags needinfo?(gshanmug)
Mudit Agarwal 2022-08-03 10:25:13 UTC Flags needinfo?(gshanmug)
Mudit Agarwal 2022-08-03 13:47:45 UTC Flags needinfo?(amagrawa)
gowtham 2022-08-03 15:35:42 UTC Assignee gshanmug tjeyasin
Aman Agrawal 2022-08-03 18:11:27 UTC Flags needinfo?(amagrawa)
Mudit Agarwal 2022-08-04 07:16:06 UTC Flags needinfo?(gshanmug)
Blocks 2094357
Doc Type If docs needed, set a value Known Issue
gowtham 2022-08-04 10:44:03 UTC Doc Text Cause: DRList page is using sync interval value to display the replication type. if it is 0 means it is considering replication type as Sync(synchronous) for the regional clusters.
Consequence:
The user might confuse, Because the backend is considering Async, and UI is displaying it as Sync.
Workaround (if any):
Need to fetch Ceph Fsid from DRCluster CR status to decide sync or async
Result:
gowtham 2022-08-04 10:45:36 UTC Doc Text Cause: DRList page is using sync interval value to display the replication type. if it is 0 means it is considering replication type as Sync(synchronous) for the regional clusters.
Consequence:
The user might confuse, Because the backend is considering Async, and UI is displaying it as Sync.
Workaround (if any):
Need to fetch Ceph Fsid from DRCluster CR status to decide sync or async
Result:
Cause: DRPolicyList page is using sync interval value to display the replication type. if it is 0 means it is considering replication type as Sync(synchronous) for the regional clusters also.
Consequence:
The user might confuse, Because the backend is considering Async, But UI is showing it as Sync type.
Workaround (if any):
Need to fetch Ceph Fsid from DRCluster CR status to decide sync or async
Result:
Olive Lakra 2022-08-10 15:32:16 UTC Doc Text Cause: DRPolicyList page is using sync interval value to display the replication type. if it is 0 means it is considering replication type as Sync(synchronous) for the regional clusters also.
Consequence:
The user might confuse, Because the backend is considering Async, But UI is showing it as Sync type.
Workaround (if any):
Need to fetch Ceph Fsid from DRCluster CR status to decide sync or async
Result:
* *User is able to set value zero minutes as Sync schedule while creating DR Policy and it reports 'Sync' as Replication policy and gets validated on a Regional-DR setup*
+
The `DRPolicyList` page uses the `sync` interval value to display the replication type. If it is set to zero then the replication type is considered as Sync(synchronous) for the metro as well as regional clusters. This issue confuses the users because the backend is considering `Async`even when the user interface shows it as `Sync` scheduling type.
+
Workaround: Need to fetch Ceph Fsid from DRCluster CR status to decide sync or async
CC olakra
Olive Lakra 2022-08-18 11:31:06 UTC Doc Text * *User is able to set value zero minutes as Sync schedule while creating DR Policy and it reports 'Sync' as Replication policy and gets validated on a Regional-DR setup*
+
The `DRPolicyList` page uses the `sync` interval value to display the replication type. If it is set to zero then the replication type is considered as Sync(synchronous) for the metro as well as regional clusters. This issue confuses the users because the backend is considering `Async`even when the user interface shows it as `Sync` scheduling type.
+
Workaround: Need to fetch Ceph Fsid from DRCluster CR status to decide sync or async
.User is able to set value zero minutes as Sync schedule while creating DR Policy and it reports 'Sync' as Replication policy and gets validated on a Regional-DR setup

The `DRPolicyList` page uses the `sync` interval value to display the replication type. If it is set to zero then the replication type is considered as Sync(synchronous) for the metro as well as regional clusters. This issue confuses the users because the backend is considering `Async`even when the user interface shows it as `Sync` scheduling type.

Workaround: Need to fetch Ceph `Fsid` from DRCluster CR status to decide `sync` or `async`.
Olive Lakra 2022-08-23 13:42:33 UTC Doc Text .User is able to set value zero minutes as Sync schedule while creating DR Policy and it reports 'Sync' as Replication policy and gets validated on a Regional-DR setup

The `DRPolicyList` page uses the `sync` interval value to display the replication type. If it is set to zero then the replication type is considered as Sync(synchronous) for the metro as well as regional clusters. This issue confuses the users because the backend is considering `Async`even when the user interface shows it as `Sync` scheduling type.

Workaround: Need to fetch Ceph `Fsid` from DRCluster CR status to decide `sync` or `async`.
.User is able to set the value to zero minutes as the Sync schedule while creating DR Policy and it reports 'Sync' as Replication policy and gets validated on a Regional-DR setup

The `DRPolicyList` page uses the `sync` interval value to display the replication type. If it is set to zero then the replication type is considered as Sync(synchronous) for the metro as well as regional clusters. This issue confuses the users because the backend is considering `Async`even when the user interface shows it as `Sync` scheduling type.

Workaround: Need to fetch Ceph `Fsid` from DRCluster CR status to decide `sync` or `async`.
gowtham 2022-08-24 15:14:39 UTC Assignee tjeyasin gshanmug
gowtham 2022-09-27 06:37:12 UTC Assignee gshanmug tjeyasin
Mudit Agarwal 2022-09-29 03:24:34 UTC Doc Type Known Issue Bug Fix
Doc Text .User is able to set the value to zero minutes as the Sync schedule while creating DR Policy and it reports 'Sync' as Replication policy and gets validated on a Regional-DR setup

The `DRPolicyList` page uses the `sync` interval value to display the replication type. If it is set to zero then the replication type is considered as Sync(synchronous) for the metro as well as regional clusters. This issue confuses the users because the backend is considering `Async`even when the user interface shows it as `Sync` scheduling type.

Workaround: Need to fetch Ceph `Fsid` from DRCluster CR status to decide `sync` or `async`.
Sanjal Katiyar 2022-10-11 07:14:38 UTC Assignee tjeyasin skatiyar
CC skatiyar
Chandan 2022-10-11 07:17:49 UTC CC ckumar
Sanjal Katiyar 2022-10-14 11:21:27 UTC Status ASSIGNED POST
Link ID Github red-hat-storage/odf-console/pull/493
krishnaram Karthick 2022-10-17 11:00:37 UTC QA Contact tdesala amagrawa
RHEL Program Management 2022-10-17 11:00:48 UTC Target Release --- ODF 4.12.0
OpenShift BugZilla Robot 2022-10-19 09:25:22 UTC Link ID Github red-hat-storage/odf-console/pull/506
OpenShift BugZilla Robot 2022-10-19 09:25:23 UTC Link ID Github red-hat-storage/odf-console/pull/505
OpenShift BugZilla Robot 2022-10-19 12:56:24 UTC Status POST MODIFIED
Mudit Agarwal 2022-10-21 05:21:33 UTC Fixed In Version 4.12.0-79
Status MODIFIED ON_QA
Aman Agrawal 2022-11-03 13:55:51 UTC Status ON_QA VERIFIED
Sunil Kumar Acharya 2022-12-08 12:55:57 UTC Flags needinfo?(skatiyar)
Red Hat Bugzilla 2022-12-31 20:00:26 UTC CC olakra
Red Hat Bugzilla 2022-12-31 20:04:23 UTC QA Contact amagrawa
Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-01-01 00:45:31 UTC CC nthomas
Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-01-01 05:42:59 UTC CC jefbrown
Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-01-01 08:30:07 UTC CC ckumar
Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-01-01 08:32:37 UTC CC kramdoss
Alasdair Kergon 2023-01-04 04:36:15 UTC QA Contact amagrawa
Alasdair Kergon 2023-01-04 04:51:30 UTC CC ckumar
Alasdair Kergon 2023-01-04 04:59:18 UTC CC jefbrown
Alasdair Kergon 2023-01-04 05:07:00 UTC CC kramdoss
Alasdair Kergon 2023-01-04 05:23:51 UTC CC nthomas
Alasdair Kergon 2023-01-04 05:25:54 UTC CC olakra
Erin Donnelly 2023-01-06 18:43:09 UTC Flags needinfo?(amagrawa)
Blocks 2107226
CC edonnell
Aman Agrawal 2023-01-07 15:20:45 UTC Flags needinfo?(amagrawa) needinfo?(skatiyar)
Sanjal Katiyar 2023-01-09 15:31:39 UTC Flags needinfo?(skatiyar) needinfo?(skatiyar) needinfo+ needinfo+
Doc Text Cause: User was allowed to enter any value for "Sync schedule".

Consequence: User was able to add "0" as well for "async" replication policy.

Fix: Introduced an number input which will not allow a value lower than 1

Result: It should work correctly now.
Sunil Kumar Acharya 2023-01-09 15:35:57 UTC CC sheggodu
Flags needinfo+ needinfo+
Erin Donnelly 2023-01-12 16:38:07 UTC Doc Text Cause: User was allowed to enter any value for "Sync schedule".

Consequence: User was able to add "0" as well for "async" replication policy.

Fix: Introduced an number input which will not allow a value lower than 1

Result: It should work correctly now.
.`async` replication can no longer be set to `0`

Previously, you could enter any value for `Sync schedule`. This meant you could set `async` replication to `0`, which caused an error. With this update, a number input has been introduced that does not allow a value lower than 1. `async` replication now works correctly.
Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-01-31 23:39:14 UTC CC madam
Rejy M Cyriac 2023-02-08 14:06:28 UTC Resolution --- CURRENTRELEASE
Status VERIFIED CLOSED
Last Closed 2023-02-08 14:06:28 UTC
Elad 2023-08-09 16:46:41 UTC CC odf-bz-bot

Back to bug 2114501