Back to bug 2220812
| Who | When | What | Removed | Added |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEJ RATHI | 2023-07-06 06:14:18 UTC | CC | fjansen, grafana-maint, jkurik, nathans, scox | |
| TEJ RATHI | 2023-07-06 06:22:45 UTC | Depends On | 2220815, 2220816 | |
| TEJ RATHI | 2023-07-06 06:24:07 UTC | Blocks | 2220817 | |
| TEJ RATHI | 2023-07-06 07:50:06 UTC | CC | dfreiber, jburrell, rogbas, vkumar | |
| TEJ RATHI | 2023-07-06 07:51:21 UTC | CC | amctagga, aoconnor, bniver, flucifre, gmeno, mbenjamin, mhackett, sostapov, vereddy | |
| TEJ RATHI | 2023-07-06 07:52:55 UTC | Depends On | 2220831, 2220830 | |
| TEJ RATHI | 2023-07-06 07:58:29 UTC | Depends On | 2220832 | |
| Red Hat Bugzilla | 2023-07-07 08:32:08 UTC | Assignee | security-response-team | nobody |
| Avinash Hanwate | 2023-07-10 09:52:49 UTC | Alias | TRIAGE-CVE-2023-36665 | CVE-2023-36665 |
| Doc Text | A flaw was found in the protobuf.js. The affected versions of protobuf.js could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by prototype pollution. By sending a specially crafted message, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the system. | |||
| RaTasha Tillery-Smith | 2023-07-10 13:19:52 UTC | Doc Text | A flaw was found in the protobuf.js. The affected versions of protobuf.js could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by prototype pollution. By sending a specially crafted message, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the system. | A flaw was found in the protobuf.js. The affected versions of protobuf.js could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system caused by prototype pollution. By sending a specially crafted message, an attacker can execute arbitrary code on the system. |
| Avinash Hanwate | 2023-07-20 16:10:52 UTC | Summary | TRIAGE-CVE-2023-36665 protobufjs: prototype pollution using user-controlled protobuf message | CVE-2023-36665 protobufjs: prototype pollution using user-controlled protobuf message |
Back to bug 2220812