Bug 114498
| Summary: | The window lists's OMF file is not proper UTF-8 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide | Reporter: | Gary Peck <gbpeck> |
| Component: | gnome-panel | Assignee: | Mark McLoughlin <markmc> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 1.0 | CC: | alan, aleksey, aoliva, gczarcinski, ikoframe, jik, jturner, mikem |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2004-02-29 07:22:23 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Looks like it's fixed upstream according to http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2004-February/msg00259.html. *** Bug 114547 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 114898 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 116143 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 115746 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** According to bug 116475 this issue is still open in gnome-panel-2.5.3, in contrast to what comment 1 suggests. *** Bug 116475 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** It's very nice that this bug is fixed upstream, but can we please actually get that fix in rawhide? *** Bug 116631 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Does the update to gnome-panel-2.4.2-1 solve this issue? If so it needs to be propagated to 2.5.3 (upstream) (see bug 116475 for FC2 test1). *** Bug 116691 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 114667 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Should be fixed in Raw Hide now Err... You call that a fix? It was a very ugly work around! What's wrong with the correct fix proposed in bug 116691? Perhaps the fact that `aplicación', which I wrote in the bugzilla bug entry form, didn't make it to the actual bug report correctly? This was fixed upstream. All I did was pull the latest upstream tarball. If you think the upstream fix was wrong please reopen: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132715 Oh, my, sorry about my tone above. It was meant to be read in a joking tone, but only now I realize I missed :-)s all over. If you got me all wrong, please accept my deepest apologies. I added a note to the upstream bug, but I don't have permission to reopen it. I hope it doesn't get lost. Heh - don't worry, I've learned well enough at this stage not to take stuff personally :-) |
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20040105 Firebird/0.7 Description of problem: The /usr/share/omf/gnome-panel/window-list-es.omf is not properly encoded. This causes rpm updates to emit the following warning: /usr/share/omf/gnome-panel/window-list-es.omf:12: parser error : Input is not proper UTF-8, indicate encoding ! Manual de la miniaplicaic�n Lista de ventanas V2.6 ^ /usr/share/omf/gnome-panel/window-list-es.omf:12: error: Bytes: 0xF3 0x6E 0x20 0x4C Manual de la miniaplicaic�n Lista de ventanas V2.6 ^ OMF file does not exist, is not readable, or is not well-formed XML: /usr/share/omf/gnome-panel/window-list-es.omf Unable to complete update. Could not register /usr/share/omf/gnome-panel/window-list-es.omf Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): gnome-panel-2.5.3.1-2 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. install gnome-panel 2. run scrollkeeper-update 3. Actual Results: The same output as in the description. Additional info: