|Summary:||The window lists's OMF file is not proper UTF-8|
|Product:||[Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide||Reporter:||Gary Peck <gbpeck>|
|Component:||gnome-panel||Assignee:||Mark McLoughlin <markmc>|
|Status:||CLOSED RAWHIDE||QA Contact:||David Lawrence <dkl>|
|Version:||1.0||CC:||alan, aleksey, aoliva, gczarcinski, ikoframe, jik, jturner, mikem|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2004-02-29 07:22:23 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description Gary Peck 2004-01-28 19:32:20 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20040105 Firebird/0.7 Description of problem: The /usr/share/omf/gnome-panel/window-list-es.omf is not properly encoded. This causes rpm updates to emit the following warning: /usr/share/omf/gnome-panel/window-list-es.omf:12: parser error : Input is not proper UTF-8, indicate encoding ! Manual de la miniaplicaic�n Lista de ventanas V2.6 ^ /usr/share/omf/gnome-panel/window-list-es.omf:12: error: Bytes: 0xF3 0x6E 0x20 0x4C Manual de la miniaplicaic�n Lista de ventanas V2.6 ^ OMF file does not exist, is not readable, or is not well-formed XML: /usr/share/omf/gnome-panel/window-list-es.omf Unable to complete update. Could not register /usr/share/omf/gnome-panel/window-list-es.omf Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): gnome-panel-126.96.36.199-2 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. install gnome-panel 2. run scrollkeeper-update 3. Actual Results: The same output as in the description. Additional info:
Comment 1 Gary Peck 2004-02-06 04:56:39 UTC
Looks like it's fixed upstream according to http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2004-February/msg00259.html.
Comment 2 Mike McLean 2004-02-12 18:29:05 UTC
*** Bug 114547 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Mike McLean 2004-02-12 18:30:03 UTC
*** Bug 114898 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2004-02-18 17:34:23 UTC
*** Bug 116143 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2004-02-18 17:34:53 UTC
*** Bug 115746 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Leonard den Ottolander 2004-02-23 10:12:33 UTC
According to bug 116475 this issue is still open in gnome-panel-2.5.3, in contrast to what comment 1 suggests.
Comment 7 Bill Nottingham 2004-02-23 23:16:06 UTC
*** Bug 116475 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Mike McLean 2004-02-23 23:18:34 UTC
It's very nice that this bug is fixed upstream, but can we please actually get that fix in rawhide?
Comment 9 Bill Nottingham 2004-02-23 23:50:36 UTC
*** Bug 116631 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Leonard den Ottolander 2004-02-24 10:10:23 UTC
Does the update to gnome-panel-2.4.2-1 solve this issue? If so it needs to be propagated to 2.5.3 (upstream) (see bug 116475 for FC2 test1).
Comment 11 Bill Nottingham 2004-02-24 20:26:17 UTC
*** Bug 116691 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Mark McLoughlin 2004-02-27 17:57:45 UTC
*** Bug 114667 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Mark McLoughlin 2004-02-27 22:53:43 UTC
Should be fixed in Raw Hide now
Comment 14 Alexandre Oliva 2004-02-28 18:45:07 UTC
Err... You call that a fix? It was a very ugly work around! What's wrong with the correct fix proposed in bug 116691? Perhaps the fact that `aplicaciÃ³n', which I wrote in the bugzilla bug entry form, didn't make it to the actual bug report correctly?
Comment 15 Mark McLoughlin 2004-02-29 07:22:23 UTC
This was fixed upstream. All I did was pull the latest upstream tarball. If you think the upstream fix was wrong please reopen: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132715
Comment 16 Alexandre Oliva 2004-02-29 21:36:32 UTC
Oh, my, sorry about my tone above. It was meant to be read in a joking tone, but only now I realize I missed :-)s all over. If you got me all wrong, please accept my deepest apologies. I added a note to the upstream bug, but I don't have permission to reopen it. I hope it doesn't get lost.
Comment 17 Mark McLoughlin 2004-02-29 21:42:51 UTC
Heh - don't worry, I've learned well enough at this stage not to take stuff personally :-)