|Summary:||transfig needs to be updated|
|Product:||[Retired] Red Hat Linux||Reporter:||Jonathan Kamens <jik>|
|Component:||transfig||Assignee:||Trond Eivind Glomsrxd <teg>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2000-05-18 22:11:50 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description Jonathan Kamens 2000-05-18 17:29:24 UTC
Transfig needs to be updated to 3.2.3. Also, in 3.2.3a you need to specify extra include flags and libraries to get it to work properly with gdbm. I'll attach a new spec file (you'll want to change "Release").
Comment 2 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2000-05-18 22:11:59 UTC
This was updated as an errata item some weeks ago - http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHBA-2000017-02.html
Comment 3 Jonathan Kamens 2000-05-19 00:19:59 UTC
It would be easier to find things like this if the /pub/ls-lR.gz on ftp.redhat.com had been updated more recently than April 19. I *do* check for things like this before I file bug reports, but when you don't keep the information you're publishing up-to-date, it makes it more difficult to do that correctly. And why isn't the updated transfig package in RawHide?
Comment 4 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2000-05-19 14:52:59 UTC
Rawhide hasn't been updated for some time - I think the reason is it's to much of a work in progress (read: severely broken). I'll report the lack of ls -lR, but it's not the best way to find out about updates - the web site is.
Comment 5 Jonathan Kamens 2000-05-21 10:40:59 UTC
You claim that "the web site" is the best way to find out about errata. Can you explain, then, why neither http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/rh62-errata-security.html nor http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/rh62-errata-bugfixes.html mentions anything about transfig, krb5 or mutt, for example?