Bug 11812

Summary: SCSI errors when using cdrecord
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: dale
Component: kernelAssignee: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.2CC: rmiddle
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-09-30 15:38:47 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description dale 2000-06-01 00:47:39 UTC
I have been using cdrecord via the Xcdroast interface on RH 6.1 for some
time. I''ve just upgraded to RH 6.2 and it no longer works.

It goes through the process of writing the data and then hangs at the
fixating stage. I''ve tried different versions of Xcdroast and have tried
different versions of cdrecord. They all do the same thing.

The end result is that the CDR busy light stays on and I keep getting
errors in /var/log/messages like:

Jun  1 10:38:06 vic kernel: ^ISense class 0, sense error 0, extended sense
0 
Jun  1 10:38:16 vic kernel: scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid
8974, scsi0, channel 0, id 1, lun 0 Test Unit Ready 00 00 00 00 00  
Jun  1 10:38:26 vic kernel: scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid
8974, scsi0, channel 0, id 1, lun 0 Test Unit Ready 00 00 00 00 00  
Jun  1 10:38:26 vic kernel: SCSI error: host 0 id 1 lun 0 return code =
26030000 
Jun  1 10:38:26 vic kernel: ^ISense class 0, sense error 0, extended sense
0

Comment 1 Bugzilla owner 2004-09-30 15:38:47 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. However, Red Hat no longer maintains this version of
the product. Please upgrade to the latest version and open a new bug if the problem
persists.

The Fedora Legacy project (http://fedoralegacy.org/) maintains some older releases, 
and if you believe this bug is interesting to them, please report the problem in
the bug tracker at: http://bugzilla.fedora.us/