|Summary:||XFree86 Server aborts with signal 11|
|Product:||Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4||Reporter:||Russ Weight <rweight>|
|Component:||XFree86||Assignee:||X/OpenGL Maintenance List <xgl-maint>|
|Status:||CLOSED RAWHIDE||QA Contact:||David Lawrence <dkl>|
|Version:||4.0||CC:||gone, jdennis, lcm, rweight|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2004-09-22 03:36:06 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description Russ Weight 2004-05-17 21:05:44 UTC
Description of problem: During stress testing for RHEL4 A2 re0327 on an IBM X255, the Xserver crashed. I will attach the XFree86.2.log showing the messages leading up to the failure. I ran this twice and it failed both times within about 5 hours. The XFree86.2.log files were essentially the same. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6 How reproducible: With the stress test I am using, it happened 2 out of 2 times. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start up multiple Xterms (6 or more) and give each one a repeating workload (ls of a large directory, or cat of a large file, or "dmesg") and let it run until it crashes. Actual results: X Server crashed with Signal 11 Expected results: X Server should not crash Additional info:
Comment 1 Russ Weight 2004-05-17 21:11:57 UTC
Created attachment 100283 [details] XFree86 log showing messages leading up to server crash
Comment 3 Mike A. Harris 2004-09-21 05:52:47 UTC
The initial bug report comment indicates that RHEL4 A2 is being tested, however this bug is filed against RHEL 3, and we have replaced XFree86 with X.Org X11 6.8.0 in RHEL 4 development for quite a while now. Can you test our latest RHEL4 codebase with X.Org X11, and indicate wether or not the problem is still reproduceable or not. Thanks in advance. Setting bug status to "NEEDINFO"
Comment 4 Chris McDermott 2004-09-21 14:54:26 UTC
Yes, Mike. This should have been filed against RHEL4 Alpha2. When the bug was submitted, the reporter did not have access to the 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux Beta' Product. That has been rectified. We will test this against RHEL4 Beta1 and report our findings.
Comment 5 Russ Weight 2004-09-21 15:42:35 UTC
This has been tested on RHEL4 Beta1, and the failure no longer occurs.
Comment 6 Mike A. Harris 2004-09-22 03:36:06 UTC
Chris, Russ, Thanks for testing the latest codebase, and providing a status update. Setting status to "RAWHIDE" to indicate the issue is resolved in our current development packages.