Bug 124531

Summary: Cleaned up comps.xml that came on FC2 Final Disc 1
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Justin Szeto <justin>
Component: compsAssignee: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Mike McLean <mikem>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 2CC: rvokal
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: noarch   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-05-27 21:45:16 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Description Flags
comps.xml cleaned up none

Description Justin Szeto 2004-05-27 10:13:45 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6)
Gecko/20040207 Firefox/0.8

Description of problem:
Hi Red Hat.
This is not really a bug. I decided to clean up comps.xml for my own
purposes and since then decided maybe, maybe not, you might find it
helpful/useful... I hope! :) I did the following:
1. Deleted 12 blank lines.
2. Removed some trailing spaces.
3. Tags are ALWAYS in the same sequence for every <group>.
4. Within each <packagelist> tag, I alphabetically sorted the
<packagereq> tags.
5. I moved all <name> and <description> tags with xml:lang attributes
to the end of each <group> to make the file more readable.
So no information was actually changed or deleted in the file, I
simply moved lines here and there within each <group>. I think the
result is much more readable and consistent. I have run
system-config-packages using this file and it runs just as the
original comps.xml file.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
Not Applicable

Additional info:

Comment 1 Justin Szeto 2004-05-27 10:16:06 UTC
Created attachment 100622 [details]
comps.xml cleaned up

Here is the comps.xml file cleaned up, you can do with it whatever... I just
think it is much more consistent and readable...

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2004-05-27 21:45:16 UTC
Unfortunately, the translations are added by intltool out of a munged
file, so this really can't be added back in sanely.