|Summary:||config_local.php is not listed as a config file|
|Component:||squirrelmail||Assignee:||Gary Benson <gbenson>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2004-09-01 10:32:59 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description john.l.villalovos 2004-06-09 15:56:47 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514 Description of problem: Doing a: [root@webhost root]# rpm -qc squirrelmail /etc/httpd/conf.d/squirrelmail.conf /etc/squirrelmail/config.php But config_local.php is not listed as a config file. I think there should be a: /etc/config_local.php and /usr/share/squirrelmail/config/config_local.php should be a symlink to ../../../../etc/squirrelmail/config_local.php Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): squirrelmail-1.4.3-1 How reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Warren Togami 2004-06-10 02:05:27 UTC
Good catch, this would make us more compatible with the upstream RPM.
Comment 2 Warren Togami 2004-09-01 05:04:59 UTC
This has annoyed me enough to finally do something about it. Below is a difference in files installed between RH and upstream's RPM. Due to this difference, upgrades to/from upstream's RPM is problematic if the server administrator modifies config_local.php. --- sq-rh.txt 2004-08-31 19:02:38.874557807 -1000 +++ sq-up.txt 2004-08-31 19:02:45.236900756 -1000 @@ -2,89 +2,91 @@ /etc/httpd/conf.d/squirrelmail.conf /etc/squirrelmail /etc/squirrelmail/config.php +/etc/squirrelmail/config_local.php +/etc/squirrelmail/default_pref /usr/share/squirrelmail /usr/share/squirrelmail/class /usr/share/squirrelmail/class/deliver I am investigating how to best modify RH's squirrelmail package to allow a smooth upgrade away from earlier RH squirrelmail, and also to/from upstream's RPM.
Comment 5 Warren Togami 2004-09-01 10:32:59 UTC
Should be fixed in rawhide, although further testing will be needed to make sure we can do clean upgrades from older RH squirrelmail.
Comment 7 Josh Bressers 2004-12-23 20:23:16 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-654.html