Bug 125638

Summary: config_local.php is not listed as a config file
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: john.l.villalovos
Component: squirrelmailAssignee: Gary Benson <gbenson>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 2CC: wtogami
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: noarch   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-09-01 10:32:59 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 125270    

Description john.l.villalovos 2004-06-09 15:56:47 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7)
Gecko/20040514

Description of problem:
Doing a:

[root@webhost root]# rpm -qc squirrelmail
/etc/httpd/conf.d/squirrelmail.conf
/etc/squirrelmail/config.php

But config_local.php is not listed as a config file.

I think there should be a:

/etc/config_local.php

and
/usr/share/squirrelmail/config/config_local.php should be a symlink to
../../../../etc/squirrelmail/config_local.php



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
squirrelmail-1.4.3-1

How reproducible:
Always

Comment 1 Warren Togami 2004-06-10 02:05:27 UTC
Good catch, this would make us more compatible with the upstream RPM.

Comment 2 Warren Togami 2004-09-01 05:04:59 UTC
This has annoyed me enough to finally do something about it.  Below is
a difference in files installed between RH and upstream's RPM.  Due to
this difference, upgrades to/from upstream's RPM is problematic if the
server administrator modifies config_local.php.

--- sq-rh.txt   2004-08-31 19:02:38.874557807 -1000
+++ sq-up.txt   2004-08-31 19:02:45.236900756 -1000
@@ -2,89 +2,91 @@
 /etc/httpd/conf.d/squirrelmail.conf
 /etc/squirrelmail
 /etc/squirrelmail/config.php
+/etc/squirrelmail/config_local.php
+/etc/squirrelmail/default_pref
 /usr/share/squirrelmail
 /usr/share/squirrelmail/class
 /usr/share/squirrelmail/class/deliver


I am investigating how to best modify RH's squirrelmail package to
allow a smooth upgrade away from earlier RH squirrelmail, and also
to/from upstream's RPM.

Comment 5 Warren Togami 2004-09-01 10:32:59 UTC
Should be fixed in rawhide, although further testing will be needed to
make sure we can do clean upgrades from older RH squirrelmail.

Comment 7 Josh Bressers 2004-12-23 20:23:16 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-654.html