|Summary:||No kernel-doc update needed|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||David Masterson <davidm_95123>|
|Component:||rhn-applet||Assignee:||Bret McMillan <bretm>|
|Status:||CLOSED WONTFIX||QA Contact:|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2006-06-30 02:53:46 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description David Masterson 2004-08-17 20:27:43 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 Description of problem: The RHN-Applet constantly shows a red exclamation and claims that I need an update to "kernel-doc". It shows between 1 and 5 newer versions of "kernel-doc" that I could apply (from 2.6.6 and 2.6.7). However, once I run up2date, it reports that my system is up to date and no new packages are needed. I've tried removing the "kernel-doc" entries from ~/.rhn-applet/updates-released (across all "~"), but it just seems to come back anyway. Where is this coming from? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.1.7-1.1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. RHN-Applet turns into a red exclamation. 2. Click on RHN-Applet and note the list of updates. 3. Bring up Up2Date and see if it reports "no updates needed". Actual Results: Up2Date reports "no updates needed" while RHN-Applet reports that "kernel-doc" needs an update. Expected Results: Either up2date should update the system or inform rhn-applet that no updates are needed. Additional info: More information is needed on how to configure and control RHN-Applet and it's connection to up2date (or yum). There should be HELP dialogs and CONFIG buttons.
Comment 1 David Masterson 2004-08-17 20:31:56 UTC
Looking at it now, I'm not sure the description says exactly what I wanted. RHN-Applet shows a red exclamation point and between 1 and 5 newer versions of "kernel-doc" (ie. one line with up to 5 available updates). Up2Date, however, reports that my system is up-to-date. I do not see any clean way of fixing this (as in the updates-released file).
Comment 2 Matthew Miller 2005-04-26 15:34:58 UTC
Fedora Core 2 is now maintained by the Fedora Legacy project for security updates only. If this problem is a security issue, please reopen and reassign to the Fedora Legacy product. If it is not a security issue and hasn't been resolved in the current FC3 updates or in the FC4 test release, reopen and change the version to match.
Comment 3 David Lawrence 2006-04-18 20:16:21 UTC
NEEDINFO_ENG has been deprecated in favor of NEEDINFO or ASSIGNED. Changing status to ASSIGNED for ENG review.
Comment 4 Matthew Miller 2006-06-30 02:53:46 UTC
Looking through old bugs. FC2 no longer gets updates through rhn, since it's maintained by Fedora Legacy. Plus, the whole rhn-applet thing was horribly prone to this sort of thing and is being replaced in FC6. So, marking WONTFIX.