Bug 132052

Summary: %post scriptlet fails
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Tim Waugh <twaugh>
Component: anacondaAssignee: Jeremy Katz <katzj>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Mike McLean <mikem>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: jbj, jrb, otaylor
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-08-15 16:29:19 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description Tim Waugh 2004-09-08 09:57:34 UTC
Description of problem:
Just completed an installation on x86_64 from the rawhide tree
containing rpmdb-fedora-2.91-0.20040907.x86_64.rpm.  I installed in
text mode.

The greeter screen would not display, and I traced it to pango failing
to read /etc/pango/pango.modules because it was absent.  This was in

# grep -nE '(xorg-x11-libs|pango)' install.log
262:Installing pango-1.5.2-2.i386.
263:/usr/bin/pango-querymodules-32: error while loading shared
libraries: libXft.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file
or directory
264:error: %post(pango-1.5.2-2) scriptlet failed, exit status 127
265:Installing pango-1.5.2-2.x86_64.
266:/usr/bin/pango-querymodules-64: error while loading shared
libraries: libXft.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file
or directory
267:error: %post(pango-1.5.2-2) scriptlet failed, exit status 127
280:Installing xorg-x11-libs-
281:Installing xorg-x11-libs-
660:Installing pango-devel-1.5.2-2.x86_64.

But since pango requires xorg-x11-libs, I'm not sure why they got
installed in the wrong order.

Removing and reinstalling pango (both arches) post-install fixed the

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Comment 1 Owen Taylor 2004-09-08 13:56:04 UTC
Can't see how this would be caused by anything in the Pango 
packaging. Jonathan was helping QA with the same problem a
few days ago, Cc'ing in case he found anything out.

Comment 2 Jeremy Katz 2004-09-08 14:39:07 UTC
Jeff -- I haven't started poking this in earnest yet (tracking down a
couple of other things), but do you have any ideas off hand?

The order looks right on i386, but definitely seems a little bit off
for x86_64...

Comment 3 Jeff Johnson 2004-09-08 15:29:07 UTC
Get me access to an x86_64 and I'll dig out the problem.

Fix for rpm -Va on multilib same time ...

Comment 4 Jeremy Katz 2004-09-08 19:39:07 UTC