Bug 140252
Summary: | udev turns eth1 into devXXXX causing 99% cpu ifup scripts | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Paul Wouters <paul> | ||||||||
Component: | initscripts | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> | ||||||||
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> | ||||||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||||||
Version: | 3 | CC: | khanreaper, rvokal | ||||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
Fixed In Version: | FC4 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||
Last Closed: | 2005-10-03 20:09:54 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Paul Wouters
2004-11-21 19:41:45 UTC
the device renaming happens in ifup, because you specified HWADDR in the ifcfg-eth1 file. ahh indeed. Because of the dual interfaces, in the past I had tried to force the proper ethx using HWADDR in the ifcfg-eth1 file. But it was pointing to the address of the eth0 card (as per modprobe.conf) So the bug changes to 'prevent ifup looping in 99% cpu mode when stupid people mix up modprobe.conf and HWADDR paramters around :) Can you attach your ifcfg-* files and /etc/modprobe.conf from when this happens? Created attachment 107200 [details]
modprobe.conf
Created attachment 107201 [details]
ifcfg-eth0
Created attachment 107202 [details]
ifcfg-eth1
not sure if onboot=no solved the ifup problem, I dont think it did, but originally it had onboot=yes This should work in FC4, provided that HWADDR is in all the ifcfg-X scripts (there was a bug fixed with respect to handling commented HWADDR lines, which you did have one of.) |