|Product:||[Retired] Red Hat Linux||Reporter:||eth1 <kurdt>|
|Component:||installer||Assignee:||Preston Brown <pbrown>|
|Status:||CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE||QA Contact:|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||1998-12-07 20:27:57 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description eth1 1998-11-24 08:13:05 UTC
Okay. First of all, If you want to be better than micro$oft, you should first of all to help ppl or submit a kind of support for a bug when we put it. Bugzilla isn't good. Or ppl helping ppl are just not good too. I just posted a bug down here. You say it's a duplicate one. YOU COULD ALSO TELL WHAT IS THE RESOLUTION OR IT'S BASED ON WHICH BUG ... SO I CAN TRACK DOWN HOW TO SOLVE MY PROBLEM. Isn't that great? I can't install that RH5.2 thing because it can't find /redhat/base. Then? WHAT COULD I POSSIBLY DO TO FIX THAT? My e-mail is email@example.com If you have ANY answer, it would be really great if you could help me out with that bug. Linux is great, but support is really lame. Thanx a lot if you understand this. Anywayz.
Comment 1 Preston Brown 1998-11-24 16:16:59 UTC
There are some known problems with doing hard disk installs from VFAT/Windows disk partitions. If you are trying to do this, please say so. Also, don't expect incredible support if you are a) rude and b) haven't paid anything for it.
Comment 2 Preston Brown 1998-12-07 20:27:59 UTC
Not a bug.