Bug 189018

Summary: RFE: include idiot proof boiler plate on fedora-extras-development.repo
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jef Spaleta <jspaleta>
Component: fedora-releaseAssignee: David Cantrell <dcantrell>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5CC: wtogami
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-04-19 22:01:31 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description Jef Spaleta 2006-04-14 19:45:04 UTC
Description of problem:
I think the #fedora irc conversation sums the issue nicely.

<beetlepun_> Magic8Ball, fedora-extras-devel relates to unstable branches? I
thought they represented stable development libraries -- you see I don't just
work with fedora..
<Magic8Ball> beetlepun_: stable development    where did you get that idea?
<beetlepun_> Magic8Ball, as I said, I don't just work on Fedora
<Magic8Ball> beetlepun_:  that didnt answer my question
<Magic8Ball> beetlepun_: i am asking specifically why you thought  fedora had a
concept of "stable development"
<beetlepun_> Magic8Ball, where'd I get that idea? Well I know what the
difference is between a mutex and a semaphore
<Magic8Ball> beetlepun_: okay this isnt going anywhere



Can you just drop in the boiler plate from fedora-development.repo into
fedora-extras-development.repo as well so "developers" who know the difference
between a mutex and a semaphore are aren't confused into thinking
fedora-extra-development is stable.

  
Actual results:
People are idiots.

Expected results:
People are idiots

Additional info:
People are idiots.

Comment 1 Jesse Keating 2006-04-19 22:01:31 UTC
Not that these types of users would read it, I've updated it anyway in CVS. 
Will be picked up by next release.