Bug 206494

Summary: Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Paul Wouters <paul>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Jason Tibbitts <tibbs>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhide   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-09-16 06:38:12 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163779    

Description Paul Wouters 2006-09-14 18:16:22 UTC
Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/ssss/ssss.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/ssss/ssss-0.5-1.src.rpm
Description: 
ssss is an implementation of Shamir's secret sharing scheme.  ssss does
both: the generation of shares for a known secret and the reconstruction
of a secret using user provided shares.

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2006-09-16 00:03:13 UTC
I understand why you can't use the makefile, but I don't understand
"$RPM_OPT_FLAGS/%{optflags}" on the gcc command line.  Surely you only need the
"$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" bit.  This is really the only blocker I see, so I'll go ahead
and approve and you can fix it when you check in.

Review:
* source files match upstream:
   24227252aa195a146d09de1df10357a1  ssss-0.5.tar.gz
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
? build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   ssss = 0.5-1.fc6
  =
   libgmp.so.3()(64bit)
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.

APPROVED, just fix the gcc command line.

Comment 2 Paul Wouters 2006-09-16 06:24:25 UTC
*** Bug 206492 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Paul Wouters 2006-09-16 06:26:29 UTC
Thanks. It was already fixed in 0.5.0-2. Unfortunately, upon my first
submission, bugzilla timed out and I submitted again. Turned out both bugs made
it, and my comments were in the other one.

Thanks for the review and approval

Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2006-09-16 14:03:11 UTC
Oh, I apologize for not seeing that other ticket.