Bug 226420

Summary: Merge Review: slang
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Gwyn Ciesla <gwync>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: gwync, mlichvar, redhat-bugzilla
Target Milestone: ---Flags: gwync: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-12-12 14:33:33 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 426387    

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 20:59:30 UTC
Fedora Merge Review: slang

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/slang/
Initial Owner: mlichvar

Comment 1 Michael Schwendt 2007-12-22 16:50:59 UTC
$ cd slang/devel
$ cvs remove -f slang-2.1.2-makefile.patch
$ cvs commit -m ''

The file is unused and has been superseded.


$ rpmlint /home/qa/tmp/rpm/RPMS/slang-2.1.3-1.fc8.i386.rpm 
slang.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/slang-2.1.3/changes.txt

 => minor -- a few contributor's fornames use various encodings


> warning: call to '__warn_memset_zero_len' declared with
> attribute warning: memset used with constant zero length
> parameter; this could be due to transposed parameters

This is a false positive.


> checking for the onig library and header files oniguruma.h... no

oniguruma-devel is in Fedora, so add --without-onig  for
reproducible builds if it should not be built with. Else add
it as BuildRequires.


Else I don't see any packaging problems.


Comment 2 Miroslav Lichvar 2008-01-24 15:28:19 UTC
slang-2.1.3-2.fc9 buildrequires oniguruma-devel and the old makefile patch has
been removed.

Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2008-12-11 17:02:26 UTC
On current version:
rpmlint on SRPM is clean.

rpmlint on RPMS:

slang.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/slang-2.1.4/changes.txt
The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8.  Consider converting it in
the specfile's %prep section for example using iconv(1).

Easily fixable.

slang-static.i386: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.

Fix if static-only docs exist.

Source tag should be Source0.

Comment in spec on patch upstream status.

Otherwise, looks good on full review, no other blockers.

Also noticed that this review had been flagged + but never assigned or closed.

Comment 4 Miroslav Lichvar 2008-12-12 11:43:37 UTC
The changelog is a mix of UTF8 and ISO-8859-1.

Source seems to be a valid rpm tag, or is there a guideline requiring use of Source0?

The patches were not send to upstream, they just fix some file permissions, rpath and disable using a private glibc symbol to follow our guidelines.

Comment 5 Gwyn Ciesla 2008-12-12 13:31:09 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> The changelog is a mix of UTF8 and ISO-8859-1.

Right.  Should be UTF-8.

> Source seems to be a valid rpm tag, or is there a guideline requiring use of
> Source0?

I got confused, I was thinking pf Patch vs. Patch0.  Still a good practice, but not a blocker.

> The patches were not send to upstream, they just fix some file permissions,
> rpath and disable using a private glibc symbol to follow our guidelines.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment
So fix the changelog ang comment on the patches in the spec and we're good.

Comment 6 Miroslav Lichvar 2008-12-12 14:26:36 UTC
Should be fixed in slang-2.1.4-2.fc11.

Comment 7 Gwyn Ciesla 2008-12-12 14:33:33 UTC
Excellent, thank you!

APPROVED.