Bug 228617

Summary:	compiz-devel requires libdecoration.so.0
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jerry James <loganjerry>
Component:	compiz	Assignee:	Kristian Høgsberg <krh>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	6
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-08-21 16:06:58 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jerry James 2007-02-13 23:34:34 UTC

Description of problem:
yum update failed today because

--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: libdecoration.so.0 for package: compiz-devel
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: libdecoration.so.0 is needed by package compiz-devel

This only happened on my x86_64 machines.  The i386 machines all happily upgraded.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
compiz-devel-0.3.6-2.fc6

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install a previous version of compiz and compiz-devel
2. yum update

Actual results:
The yum update fails with the error message given above.

Expected results:
Yum should successfully update compiz and compiz-devel.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jerry James 2007-02-22 03:20:40 UTC

It turns out that we had both the x86_64 and i386 versions of compiz-devel
installed.  Uninstalling the i386 version let the yum update go through.  This
means that the i386 compiz-devel currently in x86_64 updates is not installable.

Comment 2 Kristian Høgsberg 2007-08-15 22:41:28 UTC

I think I tracked this one down.  Is it possible for you to reproduce the same
setup and see if it is fixed with compiz-0.5.2-5.0ec3ec.fc8?  Thanks.

Comment 3 Jerry James 2007-08-16 20:21:47 UTC

I just changed jobs and moved and, alas, I no longer have access to an x86_64
machine.  I'm i686 only until I feel rich enough to buy a new computer. :-(

Comment 4 Kristian Høgsberg 2007-08-21 16:06:58 UTC

Heh, let me know if you get an x86_64 and still see this problem.  In the
meantime, I haven't seen this reported from anybody else, and I'll close this
for now.  Thanks.