Bug 232967

Summary: LSPP: Add audit rule bit operators patch
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Steve Grubb <sgrubb>
Component: kernelAssignee: Eric Paris <eparis>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Martin Jenner <mjenner>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5.0CC: dzickus, iboverma
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2007-0959 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-11-07 19:44:45 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 224041, 233186    
Attachments:
Description Flags
patch against RHEL5 none

Description Steve Grubb 2007-03-19 18:12:14 UTC
Description of problem:
There is not good way to audit syscalls that have bit mapped options. A patch
was sent to the linux-audit mail list adding this capability. This is not
strictly required for LSPP, but helps customers.

Comment 1 Steve Grubb 2007-03-23 18:01:34 UTC
Patch has been applied and is working correctly. Tested on lspp.70 kernel.

Comment 2 Eric Paris 2007-03-23 18:24:49 UTC
Created attachment 150785 [details]
patch against RHEL5

RHEL5 version of the patch

Comment 3 Eric Paris 2007-03-23 18:25:59 UTC
removing from LSPP list.  I don't remember seeing an upstream patch for this,
just the RHEL5 version, but maybe i'm mistaken.  I'll have to look into that
before i submit for internal inclusion.

Comment 6 Don Zickus 2007-06-16 00:30:56 UTC
in 2.6.18-27.el5
You can download this test kernel from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5

Comment 8 Mike Gahagan 2007-09-12 21:52:03 UTC
Confirmed patch is in the -46.el5 kernel

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2007-11-07 19:44:45 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0959.html