Bug 239233

Summary:	Review Request: compat-vips - compatibility version of VIPS
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Adam Goode <adam>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-06-28 02:09:00 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Adam Goode 2007-05-06 16:54:32 UTC

Spec URL: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/compat-vips.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/compat-vips-7.10.21-1.fc7.src.rpm
Description: Compatibility version of VIPS. New upstream release of VIPS has new so version.

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2007-06-28 02:05:55 UTC

Is a compat-vips package really necessary.  Every package I see that requires
either of the libraries provided by the vips package seems to have exactly the
same version string:

vips-devel-0:7.12.0-1.fc8.i386
vips-tools-0:7.12.0-1.fc8.i386
vips-python-0:7.12.0-1.fc8.i386
nip2-0:7.12.0-1.fc8.i386
vips-0:7.12.0-1.fc8.i386

BTW, I note the following from rpmlint:
W: compat-vips unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libvips.so.10.8.5
/usr/lib64/libWand.so.10
W: compat-vips unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libvips.so.10.8.5
/lib64/libz.so.1
W: compat-vips unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libvips.so.10.8.5
/lib64/librt.so.1
W: compat-vips unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libvips.so.10.8.5
/lib64/libdl.so.2
These are generally just inefficiencies, but libWand is 800K, which is a bit
large for an unused library dependency.

Comment 2 Adam Goode 2007-06-28 02:09:00 UTC

Ah, ok. Good to know this isn't necessary. I was thinking this package was only
needed for F7, but with F8 coming out so soon, I'll drop it.

Also, I'll look into the dependences. I guess it's just libtool being overzealous?