Bug 243817

Summary: RHN_Satellite_500_Reference Guide/System_Details
Product: Red Hat Satellite 5 Reporter: Francesco Valente <fvalen>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: John Ha <jha>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Red Hat Satellite QA List <satellite-qa-list>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: unspecifiedCC: adstrong, bperkins, cperry
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Documentation
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-17 12:51:37 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 518252    

Description Francesco Valente 2007-06-12 04:16:31 UTC
Description of problem:

Hi there 

Just need some clarifications on the following entry:

Red Hat Network Satellite 5.0.0 Reference Guide/System_Details

Entry 181

The <guilabel>Overrides</guilabel> column identifies the config file from 
which channel will apply if the system is unsubscribed from the config 
channel that provides the file now.

Can someone help me to understand the above sentence.

Thanks for time and help



Comment 1 Michael Hideo 2007-06-20 01:30:42 UTC
Moving Bugs to John Ha and assigning.

Re-prioritization meeting on June 20, 7PM EST.

Comment 5 Brandon Perkins 2010-03-05 19:43:12 UTC
Verified.  Based on what I read on:


the text:

The Overrides column identifies the configuration file in an unsubscribed channel that would replace the same file in a currently subscribed channel. For example, if a system has '/etc/foo' from channel 'bar' and '/etc/foo' from channel 'baz' is in the Overrides column, then unsubscribing from channel 'bar' will mean that the file from channel 'baz' will be applicable. Also, if nothing is in the 'Overrides' column for a given file path, then unsubscribing from the channel providing the file will mean that the file is no longer managed (though it will not remove the file from the system). 

makes sense to me.

Comment 6 Brandon Perkins 2010-05-14 21:32:57 UTC
Release Pending.  Checked on rlx-3-10.rhndev.redhat.com with:


Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2010-05-17 12:51:37 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.