Bug 373131
Summary: | Auto Apply Errata not working correctly | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Network | Reporter: | daryl herzmann <akrherz> | ||||||||||
Component: | RHN/Backend | Assignee: | Mike Orazi <morazi> | ||||||||||
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Amy Owens <aowens> | ||||||||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||||||||
Priority: | low | ||||||||||||
Version: | rhn500 | CC: | akrherz, duffy, edsall, newbery, pcfe, pmutha, rhn-bugs, xdmoon | ||||||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||||||||
URL: | https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhn-users/2007-March/msg00059.html | ||||||||||||
Whiteboard: | US=16955 | ||||||||||||
Fixed In Version: | 5.0.5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||||
Last Closed: | 2008-04-07 20:00:19 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||||||||
Bug Blocks: | 327071, 428842 | ||||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
daryl herzmann
2007-11-09 16:47:35 UTC
What we have seen in the one customer case we know of: - ~40 errata out of the ~136 RHEL 5.1 GA errata were successfully scheduled on auto-errata update enabled systems. - 4 asynchronous errata (openldap 6255, tetex 6254, pcre 6256, kdegraphics 6257) released post 5.1 GA were correctly scheduled and updated. - If rhn_check is run on an affected system, the 5.1 GA errata are not applied. (and they are not queued up to be applied as 'pending actions' in the webui for that system) - it seems that if other actions are scheduled, and rhn_check is ran, those actions are scheduled and take place without issue. Created attachment 258171 [details]
package list
attaching a customer-provided list of errata that did not get scheduled for the
affected systems.
Hi, Currently, for errata released today samba RHSA-2007:1114 113 systems in "None" status for me python RHSA-2007:1077 0 systems currently scheduled for it sysreport RHBA-2007:1071 1 system in "Pending" We are still waiting for RHEL5 and 4.6 to be fully scheduled for our account. daryl Hi, A data later and another data point. samba RHSA-2007:1114 112 systems in "None" status for me python RHSA-2007:1077 is OK now sysreport RHBA-2007:1071 1 system in "Pending" The 1 less for samba, is because I manually applied it on one machine as a test. daryl Good day, No meaningful change with the samba or sysreport errata. Autofs and lvm2 errata's on 12 Dec seemed to get scheduled just fine. Any updates from your side? thanks, daryl Greetings, Still no meaningful change from last updates. Still waiting for samba, sysreport, RHEL 5.1 and RHEL 4.6 to be scheduled. daryl Good day, Some script/action was run against our account last night scheduling all sorts of errata against our "Auto-Errata" machines. Any comments on what was done? thanks! daryl It would appear that a script or action was run against Iowa State machines again last night. Two days straight now, RHN has attempted to apply updates that have already been applied for machines set to Auto Errata update. Here's a line of the output of /var/log/up2date for the machine with system ID 1008565488: [Tue Jan 8 19:57:31 2008] up2date RPM package conflict error. The message was: Test install failed because of package conflicts: package libpng-1.2.7-3.el4_5.1 is already installed package libpng-devel-1.2.7-3.el4_5.1 is already installed More alarming is an attempt to install a kernel (which I assume would be prevented by the skiplist): [Tue Jan 8 19:57:24 2008] up2date RPM package conflict error. The message was: Test install failed because of package conflicts: package kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-67.0.1.EL (which is newer than kernel-smp-devel-2 .6.9-55.0.9.EL) is already installed package kernel-hugemem-devel-2.6.9-67.0.1.EL (which is newer than kernel-hugemem -devel-2.6.9-55.0.9.EL) is already installed Created attachment 291159 [details]
Daily RHN Status emails
Daily status emails from 8 Jan and 9 Jan showing the many old errata getting
scheduled. All of these actions were scheduled around 7 PM on the 7th and 8th.
task-o-matic is running again this morning :) Lots of errata from 2007 getting scheduled. Created attachment 291287 [details]
RHN daily status report 10 Jan 2008
Today's RHN status email showing all sorts of errata getting scheduled.
Including:
RHSA-2007:0848 207
But I only have 114 systems :)
Here is probably the best example of this problem: https://rhn.redhat.com/rhn/errata/details/SystemsAffected.do?eid=6085 Showing 9 of my systems in "None" status for redhat-release Errata included with RHEL5.1 SSID: 1008254853 remains in its untouched state for you folks to diagnose if you wish. Created attachment 292154 [details]
RHN Status Email for 18 Jan 2008
Got this status email this morning showing a couple hundred errata from 2007
getting queued. The only problem is that I can find no evidence of this on RHN
web UI under scheduled or completed actions.
Wow, We are still waiting for RHEL 4.6, RHEL 5.1, the samba errata and any sort of explaination for what happened on 7 January. Is anybody at redhat looking at this bugzilla? The only update we get from GSS is that there is no update to report. Red Hat, I am very concerned that this bug isn't being addressed. This bug is not the RHEL4 client + rhn satellite bug that you are feverishly working to fix. If this bug is being worked on, what bugzilla entry contains the progress? thanks, daryl Daryl, this bug is clearly and correctly filed under RHN (hosted), not Satellite. Thanks Máirín, But where is the activity on this bug taking place? GSS told me there are a number of private bz entries with lots of activity regarding this issue. I highly doubt they are against RHN hosted. Those are sat customers. Does red hat believe this issue and the rhel4 client on rhn satellite to be related? daryl Hi Daryl, I'm not sure where you are seeing a connection to a satellite bug in this bug, but I don't see it; the private comments are very much hosted specific. I do not know if they are thought to be related issues. Hi Máirín, Okay, thanks as always for the help. I sure hope this is fixed before RHEL 5.2 release. daryl Hi, Was this actually fixed in rhn 5.0.5 ? Or is it pending some other release? thanks! daryl Hi- The issue about 4.6/5.1 errata was fixed. I am going to open another BZ regarding seamonkey not getting scheduled (BZ 441389). Dev is currently looking at the process to push errata as it appears that some are not getting scheduled correctly. |