Bug 378301

Summary: yum repos don't point to ppc64 update/debuginfo files
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Frank Ch. Eigler <fche>
Component: fedora-releaseAssignee: David Cantrell <dcantrell>
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 8CC: dwmw2
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: powerpc   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-11-16 14:29:34 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description Frank Ch. Eigler 2007-11-12 17:06:12 UTC
With a fedora8-equipped PS3, yum does not appear to see some ppc64 updates
in yum check-update.  It is as if the fedora-update*repo files refer to URLs
that exclude some of the needed files.  Specifically, kernel-debuginfo.

Adding a new "ppc64"-flavoured, baseurl-only clause to the yum repo file,
this works.

Comment 1 Jesse Keating 2007-11-15 19:56:15 UTC
This is going to be extremely difficult to resolve cleanly.  David, I'm up for
suggestions..

Comment 2 Frank Ch. Eigler 2007-11-16 12:49:17 UTC
Why can't the solution used for x86-64 work here?  That is, having a combined
ppc64/ppc updates/ directory?

Comment 3 Jesse Keating 2007-11-16 14:29:34 UTC
Because there is no kernel-debuginfo.i386 in the x86_64 repo, so it isn't
actually fixed there.

We may be able to fix it later with other multilib changes being discussed today.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BillNottingham/MultilibDraft

Comment 4 Frank Ch. Eigler 2007-11-16 15:30:33 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Because there is no kernel-debuginfo.i386 in the x86_64 repo, so it isn't
> actually fixed there.

But I'm not looking for the analogous kernel-debuginfo.ppc, just the .ppc64 -
the same situation as for x86-64.

> We may be able to fix it later with other multilib changes being discussed today.
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BillNottingham/MultilibDraft

OK, looking forward to it.

Comment 5 David Woodhouse 2007-11-16 15:42:21 UTC
No, kernel-debuginfo.ppc64 _is_ analogous to kernel-debuginfo.i386. On PPC64 we
favour ppc32 packages and ppc64 is the 'secondary' architecture. On x86_64 we
favour x86_64 packages and i386 is the 'secondary' architecture.

One of Bill's improvements to the plan laid out in the multilib tracker bug
(#235752) is the suggestion that x86_64 machines wishing to install i386 stuff
could just use the _normal_ i386 repository, rather than having the packages
appear in any x86_64-specific repository. If we make the tools cope with those
extra packages properly (i.e. not _installing_ them all just because they're
there), that seems like it would be the right thing to do. And would address
this problem too.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=multilib