Bug 424821

Summary: Update request: ocaml-lablgtk 2.10.0
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Stijn Hoop <stijn>
Component: ocaml-lablgtkAssignee: GĂ©rard Milmeister <gemi>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 8CC: rjones
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-02-21 14:07:35 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description Stijn Hoop 2007-12-14 10:16:34 UTC
Version 2.10.0 of ocaml-lablgtk is out:


I needed it to package some software for local use, so here are the links to the
updated .spec files. I do not use this software myself, and I do not have the
time to track upstream so I cannot become a real maintainer of this package. I
simply wished to share my work for others to build on.

The .spec file is based on the one for the current ocaml-lablgtk version in
Fedora 8, 2.6.0. There is one patch file included, taken from the ATrpms
repository which includes the correct version; but AT's spec file produces a lot
more rpmlint warnings than this one.

Spec URL: http://sandcat.nl/~stijn/RPM/ocaml-lablgtk.spec
SRPM URL: http://sandcat.nl/~stijn/RPM/ocaml-lablgtk-2.10.0-1.fc8.src.rpm

Note that I do not know if this is binary compatible with version 2.6.0 because
we do not use other software that uses this library. The
requires/obsolets/provides may have to be adjusted in case the new version is
not binary compatible.

Comment 1 Richard W.M. Jones 2008-02-16 19:37:46 UTC
Lablgtk 2.10.0 has been in Rawhide for a few months.  Can you use that

If we pull lablgtk 2.10.0 into F8 then there are a number of dependent
packages which need to be rebuilt.  At least these ones:
 - ocaml-libvirt
 - freetennis
 - ocaml-camlimages
 - ocaml-ocamlnet
(and maybe others that depend on those - I didn't check).

Comment 2 Richard W.M. Jones 2008-02-21 14:07:35 UTC
Closed - this is in Rawhide now.

Comment 3 Stijn Hoop 2008-02-21 14:19:55 UTC
Sorry for not responding earlier. The current situation will work for us -- I
can keep my own version locally until we switch to F9.