Bug 51783
Summary: | DB_VERIFY_BAD: Database verification failed | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Public Beta | Reporter: | Joseph Fannin <jhf> |
Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Jeff Johnson <jbj> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | roswell | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2001-08-15 03:16:17 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Joseph Fannin
2001-08-15 03:16:13 UTC
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 51308 *** I don't have access to bug 51308 which this has been marked as a duplicate of. I remember hearing that most of these "private" bugs are for internal builds or something similar, which makes sense, I guess. But this is really kind of ass-backwards, in that I have no way of tracking this bug now, even to only see if it's been fixed now. It reduces the effectiveness of bugzilla, IMHO; though it's probably not so, it kind of feels as if I've been brushed off. "Yeah, we know about it, thanks." I'm not too concerned about it in this case (though I am curious), but I think something should be done about it. Come to think of it, I'm going to file a bug against bugzilla. ;-) |