Bug 52905

Summary: gcc seg faults builing JDK hotspot 1.3.1 source
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Peter Brown <p.brown>
Component: gccAssignee: Jakub Jelinek <jakub>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.1   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2001-08-31 19:38:12 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description Peter Brown 2001-08-30 19:10:02 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)

Description of problem:
Got latest JDK 1.3.1 src from Sun. Fresh RH "SeaWolf" installed. Hotspot 
VM in the middle of building and seg faults on: 

../src/os_cpu/linux_i486/vm/bytes_linux_i486.inline.hpp:52 Internal error: 
Segmentation fault.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install RH 'Seawolf'
2. Download/extract Linux JDK1.3.1 source
3. Build hotspot per instructions from source

Actual Results:  Was building then:

../src/os_cpu/linux_i486/vm/bytes_linux_i486.inline.hpp:52 Internal error: 
Segmentation fault.

Expected Results:  a finished build

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jakub Jelinek 2001-08-31 18:18:36 UTC
This smells like #39858 to me.
Can you please check gcc-2.96-86 or above?

Comment 2 Jakub Jelinek 2001-08-31 18:19:48 UTC
*** Bug 52958 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Sean Zhong 2001-08-31 19:33:27 UTC
gcc-2.96-85 does not work. 
Where can I find gcc-2.96-86?

Comment 4 Jakub Jelinek 2001-08-31 19:38:08 UTC
You probably cannot find 2.96-86 anywhere (well, I have it in archive),
but you can find e.g. 2.96-96 (ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/beta/roswell/en/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS/)
or maybe even 2.96-97 (if propagated into rawhide).

Comment 5 Jakub Jelinek 2001-09-06 17:43:00 UTC
If this is not fixed by 2.96-86 and above, please reopen. I'm fairly sure
it is fixed.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 39858 ***