Bug 59201

Summary: Broken Requires in RPM/SRPM
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: greg
Component: sendmailAssignee: Florian La Roche <laroche>
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME QA Contact: Aaron Brown <abrown>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.2CC: greg
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-02-18 20:57:27 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description greg 2002-02-02 00:15:32 UTC
Description of Problem: Package looks for sendmail by packagename, should look 
for an MTA, suggest looking for the sendmail command so MTA's like Postfix will 
not break an install/build.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How Reproducible: Every time


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install or build on a system with Postfix as the MTA
2. 
3. 

Actual Results: No install or build, req. --nodeps to install/build


Expected Results: Just instal after MTA found


Additional Information: Also atd script broken as per open bug.

Comment 1 Bishop Clark 2002-02-07 07:37:38 UTC
Is postfix even officially supported by RH62?  If not, this thing will die in
'business case determination'

However, were Greg to drop a patch for the spec, and if the testing was trivial...

(my 2c, perhaps biased because PF loses mail daily at my work)

 - bish
  Cynic.

Comment 2 Eido Inoue 2002-02-18 20:48:43 UTC
re-assigning to the sendmail component

Comment 3 Florian La Roche 2002-02-18 20:57:22 UTC
What rpm was this reported against? Seems not be be something I can fix
witin sendmail, right?

Thanks,

Florian La Roche

Comment 4 Florian La Roche 2002-03-09 13:09:23 UTC
Please reopen with more information if you still think something is wrong
with the sendmail rpm.

Thanks,

Florian La Roche