Bug 605407

Summary: [abrt] crash in nautilus-2.30.1-3.fc13: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Christian Jose <fcbugz>
Component: nautilusAssignee: Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 13CC: tbzatek, tsmetana
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:44a611fd0a28a8e79f7147fdc595088f7e14b95d
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 15:31:48 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Christian Jose 2010-06-17 21:03:13 UTC
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: nautilus
comment: No idea if this is repeatable. It has not happened before.
component: nautilus
crash_function: nautilus_file_peek_display_name
executable: /usr/bin/nautilus
global_uuid: 44a611fd0a28a8e79f7147fdc595088f7e14b95d
kernel: 2.6.33.5-112.fc13.i686.PAE
package: nautilus-2.30.1-3.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
-----
Not completely sure what happened here...
Attached a camera (used very regularly)
Imported files to local disk using gThumb (again, I do this regularly)
Once file import complete, Opened Nautilus to Camera and selected all 103 files
Pressed Shift+Delete (to delete bypassing wastebasket)
28 files succesfully deleted, before Nautilus crashed
Once Nautilus restarted, I reselected the remaing 75 files and performed the same deletion succesfully.

Comment 1 Christian Jose 2010-06-17 21:03:15 UTC
Created attachment 424942 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 15:31:48 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 626207 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 15:31:48 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #626207.

Sorry for the inconvenience.