Bug 608599
| Summary: | rpm doesn't understand SHA224 signature, but is possible to add sha224 signature | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Jiri Kastner <jkastner> | ||||||
| Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Panu Matilainen <pmatilai> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security> | ||||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||||
| Version: | 6.0 | CC: | emaldona, mvadkert, pknirsch, sgrubb, syeghiay | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | rpm-4.8.0-13.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
| Clone Of: | |||||||||
| : | 1066494 (view as bug list) | Environment: | |||||||
| Last Closed: | 2011-05-19 14:19:36 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||
| Bug Depends On: | 608611 | ||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 582655, 1066494 | ||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux major release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Major release. This request is not yet committed for inclusion. Created attachment 427373 [details]
patch, which should be used, when nss will support SHA224
HASH_AlgSHA224 must be provided by nss, unless this patch is useless
Ack for the first patch (applied upstream, thanks) and also for verifying the generated signature is something rpm's implementation (ie NSS) supports (some basic sanity tests added upstream now). some progress in nss: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356713 An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0739.html |
Created attachment 427357 [details] patch solving 'Unknowk hash algorithm' output message Description of problem: rpm doesn't understand sha224, but is possible sign it with sha224 algorithm. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rpm-4.8.0-9.el6 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. modify ".gnupg/gpg.conf" to have as first default value H11 (SHA224) in 'personal-digest-preferences' and 'default-preference-list' variables, or in "~/.rpmmacros" change %__gpg_sign_cmd to %{__gpg} --digest-algo sha224 --batch --no-verbose --no-armor --passphrase-fd 3 --no-secmem-warning -u "%{_gpg_name}" -sbo %{__signature_filename} %{__plaintext_filename} 2. run "rpm -addsign some.rpm" 3. run "rpm -v --checksig some.rpm" Actual results: rpm -v --checksig mod_gnutls-0.5.6-1.md5.x86_64.rpm mod_gnutls-0.5.6-1.md5.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/Unknown hash algorithm Signature, key ID c842f47e: BAD Header SHA1 digest: OK (2a30e68848f8aa15028e160164ce309c26b6f735) V3 RSA/MD5 Signature, key ID 40e6c3a4: OK V3 RSA/Unknown hash algorithm Signature, key ID c842f47e: BAD MD5 digest: OK (7b86a7c836b21679133b77ff7cdce95b) Expected results: rpm -v --checksig mod_gnutls-0.5.6-1.md5.x86_64.rpm mod_gnutls-0.5.6-1.md5.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA224 Signature, key ID c842f47e: OK Header SHA1 digest: OK (2a30e68848f8aa15028e160164ce309c26b6f735) V3 RSA/MD5 Signature, key ID 40e6c3a4: OK V3 RSA/SHA224 Signature, key ID c842f47e: OK MD5 digest: OK (7b86a7c836b21679133b77ff7cdce95b) Additional info: