Bug 80114

Summary:	APIC error on CPU0: 04(04)
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	Larry Troan <ltroan>
Component:	kernel	Assignee:	Arjan van de Ven <arjanv>
Status:	CLOSED WORKSFORME	QA Contact:	Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	9	CC:	ichute, tao
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2003-07-28 22:05:46 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	79578

Description Larry Troan 2002-12-20 05:13:16 UTC

after a successful install on a DL760, the machine boots, has the smp kernel
highlight and I guess begins to load when the APIC error begins scrolling past.  
The system is DOA.

8.1 Beta 1
----------
Action by: Bryan.Leopard
Issue Registered
----------
Action by: arjanv
does "acpi=off" fix this?

Status set to: Waiting on Client

----------
Action by: Bryan.Leopard
doesn't appear to help at all (if I did this correctly)
When the system displayed the kernel to boot, I hit e which present me with 3
lines.  The middle line ended with "ro root=LABLE=/"
which I changed to "ro root=LABLE= apic=off/" and hit b.
So if that was correct, the result was the same. 

Status set to: Waiting on Tech

----------
Action by: arjanv
acpi=off not apic=off
or did you mean that ?
(the rest is correct)


----------
Action by: Bryan.Leopard
sorry.  Just a typo when writing issue.  used acpi=off and did not appear to help.

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2002-12-23 20:49:02 UTC

also, it's LABEL=/ acpi=off, not LABEL= acpi=off/

Comment 2 Larry Troan 2002-12-24 13:32:39 UTC

This is Issue Tracker 11864.

Comment 3 Larry Troan 2003-01-10 22:43:03 UTC

COMMENT FROM HP.....
typed in LABEL=/ acpi=off and the results are the same,
  looping with the APIC error

Comment 4 Larry Troan 2003-02-14 00:25:43 UTC

Arjan, didn't we pull APIC support out in Beta 4? (tres unstable). If so, we
should close this Bugzilla.....

Comment 5 Arjan van de Ven 2003-02-14 09:42:21 UTC

no we didn't drop APIC support

Comment 6 Larry Troan 2003-02-17 19:00:39 UTC

Must have been a "senior moment" on my part, due in part to the finger-check
above;-). Disabling/pulling ACPI support out of gingin does make more sense than
APIC.

Comment 7 Larry Troan 2003-02-17 20:40:00 UTC

Bryan,
Per dscussion with Arjan, does this box boot properly with later betas?

Comment 8 Larry Troan 2003-02-20 23:11:41 UTC

FROM ISSUE TRACKER.
--Event posted 02-20-2003 09:13am by Bryan.Leopard with duration of 0.00       
retesting with beta 5.

Comment 9 Bill Nottingham 2003-07-28 22:05:46 UTC

Please reopen if this persists.