Bug 89058
| Summary: | missing symlink to libbfd.so | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | rmhristev |
| Component: | binutils | Assignee: | Jakub Jelinek <jakub> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 9 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i386 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2004-10-07 10:29:37 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
No, that's on purpose. There is just libbfd.a. libbfd has no stable ABI and if packages other than binutils itself use libbfd.so, they'd prevent any binutils upgrades. |
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225 Description of problem: The symlink libbfd.so -> /usr/lib/libbfd-2.13.90.0.18.so is missing. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): binutils-2.13.90.0.18-9 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. gcc ... -liberty -lbfd ... 2. 3. Actual Results: linkage fails Expected Results: linkage should work Additional info: I assume is quite obvious. :-) Workaround: create the symlink by hand.