Bug 90191

Summary: data older than bdflush interval stays in memory till journal is full
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Yusuf Goolamabbas <yusufg>
Component: kernelAssignee: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.3CC: sct
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/ext3-users/2003-May/005095.html
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-09-30 15:40:52 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description Yusuf Goolamabbas 2003-05-05 09:06:17 UTC
Description of problem:

The problem is best described in this thread to ext3-users


As Neil Brown says, that this is due to a kernel bug where data older than
bdflush stays in memory till journal is full, I believe this is fixed by akpm
via the introduction of jbd_refile_buffer in fs/jbd/transaction.c but so far no
errata has been released which incorporates this fix.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Redhat Linux 7.3 running kernel 2.4.18-27 and activating the 3ware highmem-io
patch in the spec file

How reproducible:

Every time

Steps to Reproduce:

Actual results:

Have periodic stalls on the machine every few minutes when there is massive
writeout to this disk

Expected results:

Would see bdflush interval being honoured by kernel and not experience such
massive writeouts

Additional info:

Comment 1 Bugzilla owner 2004-09-30 15:40:52 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. However, Red Hat no longer maintains this version of
the product. Please upgrade to the latest version and open a new bug if the problem

The Fedora Legacy project (http://fedoralegacy.org/) maintains some older releases, 
and if you believe this bug is interesting to them, please report the problem in
the bug tracker at: http://bugzilla.fedora.us/