Bug 91958

Summary: RFE: GNU aspell-nl version instead of the current one
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide Reporter: Peter van Egdom <p.van.egdom>
Component: aspell-nlAssignee: Eido Inoue <havill>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Ben Levenson <benl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 1.0Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: 0.50-3 Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-08-01 21:39:34 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 100644    

Description Peter van Egdom 2003-05-30 11:00:51 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030509

Description of problem:
The Dutch aspell dictionary as distributed by Red Hat appears not to be the same
as the one that is available on the GNU aspell dictionary list site :


The maintainer of the GNU version of the aspell dictionary has the following to
say about this particular version :


"The word list has been compiled from a number of sources:

 1. The list used in the aspell-nl-0.1.rpm package. The main reason
    I decided to build the present package is that I could not find
    a tarball distribution of this rpm and that some ``exceptions''
    from the official lists seemed to be missing.

 2. The lists in the official announcement (1996) about spelling

 3. The list by Piet Tutelaers available on

Would it be a good idea to use the GNU version of aspell-nl instead?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. - Checkout Red Hat Linux 9 or current (30 may 2003) Rawhide.

2. - Checkout GNU Aspell Dictionaries

Actual Results:
1. - See that "aspell-nl-0.1-17" is in Red Hat.

2. - See that "aspell-nl-0.50-2.tar.bz2" exists.

Expected Results:
  Maybe Red Hat should sync with GNU Aspell Dictionaries?

Additional info:

Comment 1 Eido Inoue 2003-08-01 21:39:34 UTC
updated to 0.50 series with the aspell upgrade