Bug 1001266

Summary: sunpinyin : duplicate documentation files / potentially conflicting
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael>
Component: sunpinyinAssignee: Liang Suilong <liangsuilong>
Status: CLOSED EOL QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 26CC: liangsuilong, mrlhwliberty, pwu, supercyper1
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-05-29 12:05:17 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 993551    

Description Michael Schwendt 2013-08-26 19:57:50 UTC
Duplicate documentation files have been detected in the package
builds for Rawhide and Fedora 20. The likely cause is the unversioned
docdirs change in Fedora 20.

If your package %installs documentation files into %{_docdir}/%{name}/ to
store them in a subpackage, this now conflicts with using the %doc
macro in the base package. Since Fedora 20, the %doc macro installs into
the unversioned %{_docdir}/%{name}/ and includes everything in that
directory. One obvious fix is to decide between either using %doc or
installing into %{_docdir}/%{name}/ manually as explained in the
Packaging tricks Wiki section (for past dist releases and the versioned
docdir).

General discussion of this problem:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/338

Further information:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Installing_documentation:_2_paths

[semi-automated bug report]

[...]

=> sunpinyin-2.0.4-0.9.fc20.src.rpm
=> sunpinyin-data-2.0.4-0.9.fc20.i686 in fedora-development-i386
  File conflict with: sunpinyin-2.0.4-0.9.fc20.i686
     /usr/share/doc/sunpinyin/SLM-inst.mk
     /usr/share/doc/sunpinyin/SLM-train.mk

=> sunpinyin-2.0.4-0.9.fc20.src.rpm
=> sunpinyin-2.0.4-0.9.fc20.i686 in fedora-development-i386
  File conflict with: sunpinyin-data-2.0.4-0.9.fc20.i686
     /usr/share/doc/sunpinyin/SLM-inst.mk
     /usr/share/doc/sunpinyin/SLM-train.mk

Comment 1 Jaroslav Reznik 2015-03-03 15:00:45 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle.
Changing version to '22'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22

Comment 2 Ville Skyttä 2015-10-18 07:38:00 UTC
sunpinyin-2.0.4-0.14.fc23 is still affected.

Comment 3 Michael Schwendt 2015-12-29 20:06:15 UTC
Fix committed to Rawhide.

Unfortunately, it didn't even build anymore with the new pod2man. I've added a couple of more fixes to the spec file as well.

Is anyone still taking care of the "sunpinyin" Fedora package?

Comment 4 Jan Kurik 2016-02-24 13:13:20 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle.
Changing version to '24'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase

Comment 5 Fedora End Of Life 2017-07-25 18:34:49 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 24 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 2 (two) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 24. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '24'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version'
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not
able to fix it before Fedora 24 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 6 Fedora End Of Life 2018-05-03 08:56:11 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 26 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 26. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '26'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version'
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not
able to fix it before Fedora 26 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 7 Fedora End Of Life 2018-05-29 12:05:17 UTC
Fedora 26 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2018-05-29. Fedora 26
is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any
further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.

Comment 8 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 01:49:42 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days